China poses a dire threat to Taiwan’s semiconductor industry as it steps up efforts to poach Taiwan’s top chip talent, following the US’ implementation of stringent chip restrictions. Beijing is keen to develop its own semiconductor technologies, leveraging skilled engineers from Taiwan, Europe and other countries to circumvent US restrictions on providing China access to advanced US chips, particularly those used in artificial intelligence applications, as well as other chip technologies and manufacturing equipment.
Taiwan has always contended with talent competition from China, but the situation is worsening. The Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday said that China’s ARK Semi and ShenZhen TIGO Semiconductor have illegally poached Taiwanese chip engineers involved in research and development (R&D) to set up their own R&D centers. ARK Semi has poached 50 R&D engineers since 2020, the office said. TIGO specializes in providing data storage solutions. The companies’ talent poaching efforts are jeopardizing the development of Taiwanese semiconductor companies, the office said.
In a separate statement on Friday, the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau (MJIB) said it is investigating illegal talent poaching by 11 Chinese companies, including China’s biggest chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International, and cloud-based networking chip designer Cloudnix. The bureau said the companies represented themselves as being based in Singapore or third foreign countries to get around restrictions.
The situation is particularly dire for Taiwan as local memorychip makers and flat-panel manufacturers have lost competitiveness to their Chinese rivals, which have been utilizing old tricks to advance technologies and expand capacity with China state funds and the aid of Taiwanese talent.
Taiwan now only plays a marginal role in the world’s DRAM and LCD industries. Taiwan’s two largest LCD panel makers, AUO and Innolux, are diversifying their businesses to other segments such as chip packaging and reducing revenue reliance on LCD. They no longer consider themselves LCD companies.
Meanwhile, Nanya Technology, the nation’s largest DRAM chipmaker, is one of the victims of China’s large-scale talent poaching. The memorychip maker has lost numerous senior managers and skilled engineers over the more than 10 years since the rise of China’s top memorychip maker, Yangtze Memory Technologies. In just about a decade, Yangtze has significantly outpaced Nanya in terms of technology and capacity and plays a key role in the world’s memorychip industry, swaying the industry’s supply-demand dynamics.
In 2002, semiconductors, memorychip manufacturing and LCDs were seen as the major rising stars of Taiwan’s industry under the “two trillion, twin-star” project. In about two decades, memorychip makers and LCD manufacturers were knocked off the pedestal, while semiconductor contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and chip designer MediaTek continue to outshine world rivals and support Taiwan’s economy.
Although the government in 2022 reclassified Chinese firms and implemented stricter business espionage rules, the changes did not deter desperate Chinese companies from stealing top talent and trade secrets. They are only getting more aggressive as the offenders only face up to three years in prison or NT$25 million (US$753,103) in fines. Since 2020, the MJIB has launched more than 100 investigations into talent poaching, it said.
Taiwan is facing a severe talent shortage. The government must implement more measures, with stricter penalties to curb talent poaching and safeguard Taiwan’s competitiveness in key sectors. On the business side, companies should bolster their talent retention campaigns and talent acquisition programs to maintain their competitiveness.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS