A security wake-up call
The recent controversy surrounding Cathay United Bank’s (國泰世華銀行) core credit card system upgrade has once again sparked public concern about financial security and foreign investment backgrounds. The third-party vendor commissioned by the bank, Singapore-based financial technology firm Any Technology Pvt (AnyTech, 認和科技), was found to have been backed by Chinese capital. The firm is even controlled by an agency of the Chinese Ministry of Finance. This incident not only exposes the gaps in the supply chain review processes of financial institutions, but also challenges the government’s regulatory mechanisms regarding the activities of Chinese companies in Taiwan.
In response to the findings, Cathay United Bank terminated its contract with AnyTech ahead of schedule, but whether this would be enough to restore market confidence remains in question. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has fined AnyTech NT$2.17 million (US$65,553) under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
Compared with the potential national and information security risks this incident has caused, it is debatable whether such a punishment is sufficient.
Core credit card systems are highly sensitive infrastructure involving a large amount of personal data and transaction records. Allowing system management authority to fall into the hands of foreign entities — especially companies backed by the Chinese government — not only threatens the financial security of Taiwanese consumers, but also poses the risk of leaking personal financial data. This kind of information holds extremely high strategic value to the Chinese government. If China were to use it for financial surveillance or economic warfare, there would be unimaginable consequences.
Although the government has outlined clear regulations that prohibit companies with ties to the Chinese government from entering Taiwan’s critical infrastructure sectors, many Chinese firms manage to bypass these restrictions by making roundabout investments or establishing subsidiaries in third countries.
AnyTech opted for the latter, establishing a subsidiary in Taiwan through a company registered in Singapore — its success in doing so highlights the gaps in Taiwan’s review mechanisms. Moving forward, the government should strengthen its real beneficiary investigation process by conducting stricter and more thorough checks on the shareholders and sources of funding behind firms to mitigate potential risks.
Financial institutions must also enhance their cybersecurity awareness and establish more comprehensive supply chain review mechanisms to ensure external partners meet security standards to safeguard consumer rights and national security.
This incident might urge the government to amend legislation to raise review standards for foreign investment involving critical infrastructure, or expand the scope of supervision over Chinese companies.
This case was not just a crisis for Cathay United Bank, but a wake-up call for Taiwan’s entire financial cybersecurity system. The government and businesses must earnestly address this issue to avoid repeating mistakes.
Chen Chi
Taipei
Free speech still has limits
China-born influencer, Liu Zhenya (劉振亞) — better known by her social media handle “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣) — advocated for China to “unify Taiwan using military force.” As a result, the government revoked her dependent-based residency permit and ordered her to return to China or be deported.
The majority of Taiwanese applauded this move, but a small group of academics have recently spoken out against it. The group has made multiple alarmist claims, even urging the Democratic Progressive Party government to “halt at the brink of the abyss.”
The academics’ doubts stem from ignorance, as they defy mainstream public opinion and lack reason and legal basis. Freedom of speech does not mean that you are completely free to say whatever you want without restraint — one must still adhere to the boundaries of law and reason. Otherwise, what is the purpose of enacting laws?
Articles 309 and 310 of the Criminal Code, which address the crimes of public insult and slander, are fundamental regulations that limit freedom of speech. Any infringement upon individual rights and interests must be subject to criminal prosecution and punishment. This is particularly true with a crime as serious as contravening national security.
Liu using her platform to advocate for military unification is equivalent to encouraging the use of Chinese military force against Taiwan. Such statements threaten the safety of others — thus, they cannot be considered protected under freedom of speech. If advocating for China to use military force against Taiwan is also considered free speech, then perhaps we should stop prohibiting people from shouting that they have a bomb on an airplane.
Encouraging forced unification is tantamount to advocating for a military invasion — how could these people exaggerate the issue and make such far-fetched arguments claiming that the government is compressing space for “free speech”?
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS