The top diplomats from Japan, China and South Korea held talks in Tokyo on Saturday. Given that they took place at such a sensitive time — US-China tensions are high, the Ukraine war is ongoing and US President Donald Trump continues to pressure Washington’s traditional allies — the meeting attracted international attention.
At the start of the meeting, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya said: “Given the increasingly severe international situation, I believe we may truly be at a turning point in history.”
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the conclusion of World War II, urging the three countries to revisit the consensus of respecting history and looking to the future.
South Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Cho Tae-yul said that maintaining peace on the Korean Peninsula is in the common interest of all three countries.
However, there are still many deeply rooted conflicts between the three nations and many issues have not yet been resolved.
First, Chinese naval vessels frequently intrude into the waters surrounding Japan’s Senkaku Islands, known in Taiwan as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). China has also failed to deliver on its repeated promises to lift its ban on Japanese seafood imports and has detained Japanese citizens without cause. These actions have created difficulties and unresolved tensions between the two countries.
Second, ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol — who has typically taken a pro-Japan stance — is in a slew of legal trouble. This coupled with a dispute over the sovereignty of islands called Takeshima in Japanese and Dokdo in Korean has cast a shadow over the unity between Tokyo and Seoul.
Third, there is a dispute between China and South Korea over exclusive economic zones in the Yellow Sea. Additionally, China is encroaching upon South Korea’s industries, leading the business community to decouple itself from China. While relations between the two countries appear friendly, there are many issues below the surface.
Japan, China and South Korea each have their own unique concerns and each side pursued its own agenda at the meeting.
In the wake of an economic downturn and Trump’s strategy of allying with Moscow and resisting Beijing, China finds itself facing domestic and international pressure.
Meanwhile, the US, Japan and South Korea have occasional disputes under the shadow of Trump’s increased tariffs — which presents a heaven-sent opportunity for China to exploit divisions between them, hence why it has frequently reached out to Japan and South Korea.
For South Korea, due to Yoon’s impeachment and ongoing civil unrest — along with recently being listed as a “sensitive” country by the US Department of Energy due to visitors from the country mishandling sensitive information in US laboratories — the absence of solid leadership has made it increasingly difficult to reach any diplomatic breakthroughs.
According to an opinion poll published by the Asahi Shimbun on March 16, the approval rating of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Cabinet has dropped to a dangerous 26 percent, setting a new low since he took office last year.
Recently, Ishiba has also come under fire for potentially contravening the law by giving vouchers to newly elected lawmakers ahead of a dinner at his official residence. With Ishibia preoccupied by his own issues, he would likely be powerless to break any deadlock between Japan and China even if he wanted to.
The three-way talks yielded no substantial outcomes due to the individual agendas of Japan, China and South Korea. Although Wang emphasized that Asia should have the power to control its own destiny and called for increased cooperation between the three countries, Japan — as an ally of the US — has no choice but to follow Trump’s banner of full-scale opposition to China.
Japan this week is to welcome US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for the first time, which would boost the US-Japan alliance, providing Wang with a clear response through action.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS