The top diplomats from Japan, China and South Korea held talks in Tokyo on Saturday. Given that they took place at such a sensitive time — US-China tensions are high, the Ukraine war is ongoing and US President Donald Trump continues to pressure Washington’s traditional allies — the meeting attracted international attention.
At the start of the meeting, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya said: “Given the increasingly severe international situation, I believe we may truly be at a turning point in history.”
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the conclusion of World War II, urging the three countries to revisit the consensus of respecting history and looking to the future.
South Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Cho Tae-yul said that maintaining peace on the Korean Peninsula is in the common interest of all three countries.
However, there are still many deeply rooted conflicts between the three nations and many issues have not yet been resolved.
First, Chinese naval vessels frequently intrude into the waters surrounding Japan’s Senkaku Islands, known in Taiwan as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). China has also failed to deliver on its repeated promises to lift its ban on Japanese seafood imports and has detained Japanese citizens without cause. These actions have created difficulties and unresolved tensions between the two countries.
Second, ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol — who has typically taken a pro-Japan stance — is in a slew of legal trouble. This coupled with a dispute over the sovereignty of islands called Takeshima in Japanese and Dokdo in Korean has cast a shadow over the unity between Tokyo and Seoul.
Third, there is a dispute between China and South Korea over exclusive economic zones in the Yellow Sea. Additionally, China is encroaching upon South Korea’s industries, leading the business community to decouple itself from China. While relations between the two countries appear friendly, there are many issues below the surface.
Japan, China and South Korea each have their own unique concerns and each side pursued its own agenda at the meeting.
In the wake of an economic downturn and Trump’s strategy of allying with Moscow and resisting Beijing, China finds itself facing domestic and international pressure.
Meanwhile, the US, Japan and South Korea have occasional disputes under the shadow of Trump’s increased tariffs — which presents a heaven-sent opportunity for China to exploit divisions between them, hence why it has frequently reached out to Japan and South Korea.
For South Korea, due to Yoon’s impeachment and ongoing civil unrest — along with recently being listed as a “sensitive” country by the US Department of Energy due to visitors from the country mishandling sensitive information in US laboratories — the absence of solid leadership has made it increasingly difficult to reach any diplomatic breakthroughs.
According to an opinion poll published by the Asahi Shimbun on March 16, the approval rating of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Cabinet has dropped to a dangerous 26 percent, setting a new low since he took office last year.
Recently, Ishiba has also come under fire for potentially contravening the law by giving vouchers to newly elected lawmakers ahead of a dinner at his official residence. With Ishibia preoccupied by his own issues, he would likely be powerless to break any deadlock between Japan and China even if he wanted to.
The three-way talks yielded no substantial outcomes due to the individual agendas of Japan, China and South Korea. Although Wang emphasized that Asia should have the power to control its own destiny and called for increased cooperation between the three countries, Japan — as an ally of the US — has no choice but to follow Trump’s banner of full-scale opposition to China.
Japan this week is to welcome US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for the first time, which would boost the US-Japan alliance, providing Wang with a clear response through action.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS