The top diplomats from Japan, China and South Korea held talks in Tokyo on Saturday. Given that they took place at such a sensitive time — US-China tensions are high, the Ukraine war is ongoing and US President Donald Trump continues to pressure Washington’s traditional allies — the meeting attracted international attention.
At the start of the meeting, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya said: “Given the increasingly severe international situation, I believe we may truly be at a turning point in history.”
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the conclusion of World War II, urging the three countries to revisit the consensus of respecting history and looking to the future.
South Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Cho Tae-yul said that maintaining peace on the Korean Peninsula is in the common interest of all three countries.
However, there are still many deeply rooted conflicts between the three nations and many issues have not yet been resolved.
First, Chinese naval vessels frequently intrude into the waters surrounding Japan’s Senkaku Islands, known in Taiwan as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). China has also failed to deliver on its repeated promises to lift its ban on Japanese seafood imports and has detained Japanese citizens without cause. These actions have created difficulties and unresolved tensions between the two countries.
Second, ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol — who has typically taken a pro-Japan stance — is in a slew of legal trouble. This coupled with a dispute over the sovereignty of islands called Takeshima in Japanese and Dokdo in Korean has cast a shadow over the unity between Tokyo and Seoul.
Third, there is a dispute between China and South Korea over exclusive economic zones in the Yellow Sea. Additionally, China is encroaching upon South Korea’s industries, leading the business community to decouple itself from China. While relations between the two countries appear friendly, there are many issues below the surface.
Japan, China and South Korea each have their own unique concerns and each side pursued its own agenda at the meeting.
In the wake of an economic downturn and Trump’s strategy of allying with Moscow and resisting Beijing, China finds itself facing domestic and international pressure.
Meanwhile, the US, Japan and South Korea have occasional disputes under the shadow of Trump’s increased tariffs — which presents a heaven-sent opportunity for China to exploit divisions between them, hence why it has frequently reached out to Japan and South Korea.
For South Korea, due to Yoon’s impeachment and ongoing civil unrest — along with recently being listed as a “sensitive” country by the US Department of Energy due to visitors from the country mishandling sensitive information in US laboratories — the absence of solid leadership has made it increasingly difficult to reach any diplomatic breakthroughs.
According to an opinion poll published by the Asahi Shimbun on March 16, the approval rating of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Cabinet has dropped to a dangerous 26 percent, setting a new low since he took office last year.
Recently, Ishiba has also come under fire for potentially contravening the law by giving vouchers to newly elected lawmakers ahead of a dinner at his official residence. With Ishibia preoccupied by his own issues, he would likely be powerless to break any deadlock between Japan and China even if he wanted to.
The three-way talks yielded no substantial outcomes due to the individual agendas of Japan, China and South Korea. Although Wang emphasized that Asia should have the power to control its own destiny and called for increased cooperation between the three countries, Japan — as an ally of the US — has no choice but to follow Trump’s banner of full-scale opposition to China.
Japan this week is to welcome US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth for the first time, which would boost the US-Japan alliance, providing Wang with a clear response through action.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan, and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS