Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Friday attempted to push through two referendum proposals — one opposing the abolition of the death penalty, and another rejecting martial law and war — in the Legislative Yuan, in what appeared to be a desperate move to counter the growing nationwide mass recall movement targeting them.
As of last week, 34 out of the KMT’s 36 district legislators were facing second-phase recall petitions, while the party’s original counter-plan — recall campaigns against Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers — failed to pass the first phase. Compounding the setback, several KMT workers are under investigation for alleged forgery, as many of the submitted petitions included names of unsuspecting or even deceased people.
The KMT said it would prioritize legislation that improves people’s “livelihoods” this session, including giving a “universal cash payment” of NT$10,000 to each resident. KMT legislators have also called for a “mandatory death penalty” for those convicted of child abuse resulting in death. The referendum proposal is just the latest in a series of attempts to win support amid a mounting public backlash.
The KMT’s “anti-martial law” referendum proposal states: “President William Lai [賴清德] has labeled China as a hostile foreign force, and the public is concerned that cross-strait relations might enter a quasi-war,” asking: “Do you agree that the government should avoid war and prevent Taiwan from becoming another Ukraine, where martial law is imposed, young lives are lost and homes are destroyed?”
The other proposed referendum asks: “Do you agree with the policy of a ‘collegiate bench of judges of courts of all levels do not need a unanimous verdict to impose a death sentence?’”
The KMT legislative caucus issued a three-line whip to ensure party discipline in passing the proposals, but heated debate among lawmakers stalled the process. The proposals have been rescheduled for review tomorrow.
Central Election Commission Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) said the proposals appear “self-contradictory” and illogical, as they seek to ask the government to halt policies that are not being implemented, and might even be illegal or unconstitutional.
The Referendum Act (公民投票法) says that a referendum proposal should “address only one issue,” yet the “anti-martial law and anti-war” proposal combines multiple vague concepts. It also appears aimed to mislead voters into believing that labeling China as a “foreign hostile force” would lead to “quasi-war” — a term undefined in the proposal. It further conflates this scenario with hypothetical notions of invoking “martial law” and “wartime Ukraine” in Taiwan.
The proposal is also a leading question, implicitly urging voters to vote “no” to a mix of concepts under the guise of anti-war messaging, which contravenes the act’s stipulation that “the main text of the proposal must be concise, clear and objectively neutral.”
The proposal against abolishing the death penalty refers to a Constitutional Court verdict last year that requires a unanimous decision among judges to impose the death penalty, which the KMT claims amounts to its “substantive abolition.”
While a Constitutional Court verdict is not equal to the Constitution itself, it has binding legal force and can only be overturned through a constitutional amendment. By framing the verdict as a mere “policy” and proposing a referendum to reject it, the KMT’s approach bypasses proper constitutional procedures.
Although the KMT’s goal is to push for the referendums to be held on the same day as recall voting, hoping to encourage people to support the referendums while voting “no” on recalling its legislators, its proposals might backfire, fueling contempt and strengthening the resolve of recall petitioners aiming to remove KMT lawmakers and put an end to what many see as political theatrics.
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS