The Taipei District Court, which is handling the Core Pacific City corruption case, held its first hearing for former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday. Ko said of Core Pacific Group chairman Sheen Ching-jing (沈慶京): “If Sheen and his group go down, how many people will be out of work?”
Ko seems to be implying that the judiciary should not care whether Sheen committed a crime, nor should it investigate whether he had accomplices — instead, it should focus on more important matters, such as “how many people will be out of work” if Sheen and his group are found guilty.
It seems that the judiciary should also ignore manufacturers that sell gutter oil scraped from the factory floor. After all, should it not consider how many people would lose their jobs if such unethical businesses were forced to shut down? Should the judiciary also disregard the harms caused by criminal gangs and scammer groups, and instead worry about how many people would be left unemployed if those collapsed? Is Ko’s moral compass really so absurd?
Ko also said: “When Sheen came to the mayor’s office, he only discussed his girlfriend.” Wow. Is Ko saying that, during his tenure as Taipei mayor, his office became a hub for gossiping about personal love affairs?
Ko once praised former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng (彭振聲), saying he is a talent who was recruited through an open selection process. “He demolished the Zhongxiao Bridge (忠孝橋) overpass in just 87 hours, and built 12,000 social housing units. His skills are evident,” he said. Even if that were true, what does it prove? Does he mean capable people never commit corrupt acts or abuse their power? More often than not, those who are involved in corruption or misconduct are quite capable.
Furthermore, official data showed that at the end of August 2023, there were 27,781 social housing units in Taiwan, with only 23.51 percent planned and completed during Ko’s mayoral term — that amounts to about 6,531 units. Where did Ko get 12,000 from? Did he combine completed units, planned units, projects that have begun land preparation and those under construction, but not yet completed?
Ko also said he found it unbelievable that Pong and former Taipei Urban Planning Commission executive secretary Shao Hsiu-pei (邵琇珮) pleaded guilty. Many defendants plead guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence or probation — a common and reasonable practice in the legal world. What is so “unbelievable” about it? The case is bright and clear — the eyewitnesses, facts and physical evidence have been laid out neatly before us, yet a strong legal case is somehow being twisted into a political witch hunt. Ko dared to commit the act, but now lacks the courage to take responsibility for it. Is this not what the public should call “unbelievable”?
“Several people below myself had already stamped the documents, so why wouldn’t I stamp them?” Ko said. It turns out that his method of governing was simply to act as a rubber stamp all along. If that is the case, Ko, why elect you as mayor?
“City councilors pressure the city government, and department heads handle it. If they cannot handle it, they would report it at the morning meeting,” Ko said.
If city councilors pressure the city government, should the department heads not “handle it” in accordance with the law? What does Ko even mean by “cannot handle it?” Taking a step back, if they “cannot handle it” and report it at the morning meeting, is the matter not over? What more is there to it?
If a department head “cannot handle” their responsibilities and Ko does not replace them, where is the so-called “rationality, pragmatism and science” in that?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
RSS