Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported.
Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still left in Taiwan, spreading ideas about China’s threat of unification by force in city streets or villages? It is quite concerning.
During former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the required period for Chinese nationals to acquire a national identification card was shortened from eight years to six years. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have even proposed shortening this period to four years, but have cross-strait tensions eased? Have Taiwan’s national defense and psychological preparedness improved? Are Taiwanese living more peaceful and stable lives? How in the world could someone live in a country while hoping it gets annexed by another?
To strengthen loyalty, the required residence period for Chinese before they can become naturalized citizens and obtain ID cards should be extended from six years back to eight years. Due to the current cross-strait situation and national defense needs, mandatory military service was lengthened from four months to one year. Chinese are citizens of a country that President William Lai (賴清德) has designated as a “foreign hostile force,” and — given the evidence that statements supporting China’s “unification by force” have been made publicly on Taiwanese soil — it is necessary that the residency period for Chinese nationals be extended by at least two years. In addition, they should be required to review the “Knowing Taiwan” curriculum and watch late filmmaker Chi Po-lin’s (齊柏林) documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan from Above, to deepen their recognition of Taiwan and its sovereignty.
Steps like these are essential to changing the inherited mentality of military unification and overcoming the harm caused by an authoritarian upbringing. The time has come to change the way that Chinese are treated in Taiwan.
If the entire nation can unite as one, it will further facilitate social integration and strengthen internal solidarity. Such unity would help to successfully complete the goals and mission of opposing the Chinese Communist Party and protecting Taiwan.
Hsiao Chia-hung is an English-speaking tour guide.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS