The foreign ministers of G7 nations on Friday last week issued a joint statement that expressed a tougher stance on China and did not contain the usual references to the “one China” policy, showing a shift from traditional appeasement to growing international dissatisfaction with Beijing’s increasing aggression in the Asia-Pacific region.
The statement said that the ministers “reiterated the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait” and are “opposed to any unilateral attempt to change the status quo through force of coercion.”
It expressed “deep concerns about China’s military buildup and the continued, rapid increase in China’s nuclear weapons arsenal.”
In a Declaration on Maritime Security and Prosperity, the G7 ministers emphasized their concerns over China’s “unjustifiable efforts to restrict freedom [of navigation] and to expand its jurisdiction through use of force and other forms of coercion, including across the Taiwan Strait, in the South China Sea, the Red Sea and the Black Sea.”
They condemned “China’s illicit, provocative, coercive and dangerous actions that seek unilaterally to alter the status quo in such a way to risk undermining the stability of regions.”
In addition to a significant growth in defense expenditure to enhance the world’s second-largest military to pursue its ambitious “rejuvenation of China,” Beijing strikingly increased its military drills to assert its territorial claims and to intimidate other nation in the Asia-Pacific region.
The Japanese Ministry of Defense said that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy last year passed by Japan’s Nansel Island 68 times while sailing between the East China Sea and the Pacific Ocean, a number three times higher than that recorded in 2021 and including an aircraft carrier’s first visit to Japan’s contiguous waters.
Japanese Minister of Defense Gen Nakatani has warned of the danger of the rapid increase in incidents.
“We are facing strategic challenges of an unprecedented size,” he said.
The PLA Navy last month conducted live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea without providing customary notification to Australia or New Zealand and causing more than 49 civilian flights to be diverted. China’s intrusive move sparked protests from the two nations and raised concerns about regional security.
Besides its increasing maritime confrontations with the Philippines, China also launched four days of live-fire exercises without warning in the Gulf of Tonkin, fueling concerns in Vietnam and neighboring nations.
Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro said that China’s increasing aggression is “the greatest threat” to the security of the region and to the international order.
China’s military maneuvers are a deliberate demonstration of its naval capability to break through the first and second island chains, and to project its power in places far beyond.
China’s reckless moves have also accentuated the strategic role of Taiwan, which has long been the first target of China’s territorial expansionism and intensive military coercion.
The G7 statement said that “peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is indispensable to international security and prosperity.”
The US Department of State on Wednesday also reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to deterring threats against Taiwan’s security and criticized China’s drills near Taiwan on Tuesday as “brazen and irresponsible.” Even Switzerland, with its policy of neutrality, issued a rare rebuke to Beijing over its naval drills in the waters off Taiwan.
Taiwan needs to deepen its ties with democracies to counter authoritarian nations, especially China.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS