Ambitions by the BRICS group to take on a greater climate leadership role, building on success last month at UN nature talks, depend on the countries overcoming fractious politics and entrenched disagreements over money.
As the US has withdrawn from global efforts to combat climate change and, more generally, shifted its focus to promoting domestic interests, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — known collectively as the BRICS — are well-placed to influence the outcomes of high-profile meetings this year.
They established their credentials by proposing a draft text that ensured agreement at the 16th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP16) talks last month in Rome, a dozen sources said, potentially unlocking billions of US dollars to help halt the destruction of ecosystems.
Illustration: Mountain People
“Now BRICS has been able to come together in this fashion, [it] will influence our discussions in other platforms going forward,” South African Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Narend Singh said.
South Africa is boosting its profile as holder of the G20 presidency this year, while BRICS member Brazil prepares to host the UN climate conference, COP30, in November.
“BRICS can fill a space that needs to be filled at this moment in the multilateral negotiations,” said Maria Angelica Ikeda, Brazil’s chief negotiator at COP16.
Colombian Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development Susana Muhamad, president of the COP16 nature talks, said the BRICS countries were positioning to be “bridge builders.”
“They are trying to create this balance to represent the Global South in front of the far-right governments that are emerging in the US, Italy and Argentina,” she said. “I understand there’s a lot of countries wanting to join BRICS, because it’s a way, if you have to confront something like the US, you are not alone.”
A British official present at the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said other countries needed to consider what the BRICS’ more muscular approach meant for global institutions.
If BRICS is to help fill the vacuum left by Washington under US President Donald Trump, it has to address internal divisions over politics and finance.
The group’s refusal to assume the official financial obligations of donor countries could prove a stumbling block, London School of Economics distinguished policy fellow Timo Leiter said.
So far, the middle-income BRICS have resisted demands from cash-strapped developed countries that they should share financial liability, complicating the quest for compromise at UN negotiations on climate funding and upcoming talks on development finance in Seville, Spain.
Of the US$25.8 billion in biodiversity-related financing in 2022, nearly three-quarters came from five sources: EU institutions, France, Germany, Japan and the US, data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed.
Diverging national interests among the BRICS, with Russia keen to maintain its sales of fossil fuels, while Brazil presses countries to decarbonize faster at COP30, might also prove sticking points.
“They [the BRICS] are drastically different in terms of development stage and emissions trajectory,” Asia Society China Climate Director Li Shuo (李碩) said. “What ties them together is the geopolitical aspiration which leads to the question of can they agree to put forward an affirmative agenda.”
A test of the group’s solidarity could be at a meeting in Bonn, Germany, in June where countries begin to set out their COP30 negotiating positions, analysts said.
The Financing for Development conference in Seville in June could also prove pivotal, with ministers set to discuss global sustainability goals and ongoing reform of the international financial system.
“This will be the perfect entry point for BRICS to advance their aim of changing the global order and having a stronger say in the global financial system,” Leiter said. “The new US position is almost a gift.”
Shorter-term, the BRICS are likely to renew demands for more say in the running of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), which disburses much of the world’s biodiversity finance.
GEF reform is a focus as richer countries cut development spending while demanding nature-rich countries do more to protect ecosystems such as the Amazon.
“It’s a problem that instead of having more money directed to nature and to biodiversity, we have countries updating their nuclear weapons, or buying more armaments,” Ikeda said. “At the same time, they’re demanding from us, the mega-diverse countries more and more obligations.”
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS