The Ministry of Finance recently announced that the government last year collected record-high tax revenue, exceeding its budget projections by NT$528.3 billion (US$16.03 billion). Determining how the surplus should be used has become a focal issue for the government and opposition parties.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has proposed that the government distribute NT$10,000 in cash to each taxpayer to directly return the funds to the public.
Would that really support the long-term interests of the nation?
From the perspective of fiscal stability, it would be more cautious and forward-thinking to prioritize use of the surplus to reduce the national debt.
Many people mistakenly believe that tax revenue surplus means that the government has extra income, but that is not the case.
A surplus simply means that the national tax revenue collected exceeded the amount that was predicted — it does not mean that the treasury is overflowing.
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office in 2016, the central government’s debt was NT$5.39 trillion, Ministry of Finance data showed. It is expected to increase to NT$6.01 trillion this year, with interest payments alone of hundreds of billions of New Taiwan dollars annually.
Although using the surplus revenue for cash handouts would stimulate short-term consumption, it would not benefit the country’s financial system.
In contrast, investing in national debt repayment would reduce interest expenditures and improve the flexibility of the government’s financial operations.
One argument in support of the KMT’s proposal is that the economic benefits should be shared among every taxpayer.
However, a one-time subsidy would not address structural economic issues. If the government’s finances remain unstable in the long term, it might need to increase taxes or cut public spending, which would also affect everyone.
Using the surplus to reduce the national debt would free up resources that the government could invest in public infrastructure, education and social welfare to further enhance national competitiveness.
Many countries are facing high national debts. Poor financial management can exacerbate the issue and give rise to more severe economic crises.
In the past few years, the global economic environment has changed dramatically and rising interest rates might increase states’ financing costs. If the central government does not take advantage of its relatively stable financial situation to reduce the national debt, fiscal pressure is likely to increase.
Moreover, reducing the debt would improve the country’s credit rating, which would lower its financial costs and make Taiwan more competitive in the international market.
The smart use of the surplus revenue is crucial to the country’s fiscal stability and development. The government should avoid short-sighted fiscal maneuvers in search of instant gratification.
Rather than cash handouts, the government’s priority should be reducing the national debt to ensure fiscal resilience, while making appropriate public investments to enhance the nation’s competitiveness.
Sound fiscal policy is the cornerstone of long-term national development. Only through thoughtful planning can future generations be saved from bearing heavy financial burdens, with the added benefit of a more stable and sustainable economy.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS