The Ministry of Finance recently announced that the government last year collected record-high tax revenue, exceeding its budget projections by NT$528.3 billion (US$16.03 billion). Determining how the surplus should be used has become a focal issue for the government and opposition parties.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has proposed that the government distribute NT$10,000 in cash to each taxpayer to directly return the funds to the public.
Would that really support the long-term interests of the nation?
From the perspective of fiscal stability, it would be more cautious and forward-thinking to prioritize use of the surplus to reduce the national debt.
Many people mistakenly believe that tax revenue surplus means that the government has extra income, but that is not the case.
A surplus simply means that the national tax revenue collected exceeded the amount that was predicted — it does not mean that the treasury is overflowing.
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office in 2016, the central government’s debt was NT$5.39 trillion, Ministry of Finance data showed. It is expected to increase to NT$6.01 trillion this year, with interest payments alone of hundreds of billions of New Taiwan dollars annually.
Although using the surplus revenue for cash handouts would stimulate short-term consumption, it would not benefit the country’s financial system.
In contrast, investing in national debt repayment would reduce interest expenditures and improve the flexibility of the government’s financial operations.
One argument in support of the KMT’s proposal is that the economic benefits should be shared among every taxpayer.
However, a one-time subsidy would not address structural economic issues. If the government’s finances remain unstable in the long term, it might need to increase taxes or cut public spending, which would also affect everyone.
Using the surplus to reduce the national debt would free up resources that the government could invest in public infrastructure, education and social welfare to further enhance national competitiveness.
Many countries are facing high national debts. Poor financial management can exacerbate the issue and give rise to more severe economic crises.
In the past few years, the global economic environment has changed dramatically and rising interest rates might increase states’ financing costs. If the central government does not take advantage of its relatively stable financial situation to reduce the national debt, fiscal pressure is likely to increase.
Moreover, reducing the debt would improve the country’s credit rating, which would lower its financial costs and make Taiwan more competitive in the international market.
The smart use of the surplus revenue is crucial to the country’s fiscal stability and development. The government should avoid short-sighted fiscal maneuvers in search of instant gratification.
Rather than cash handouts, the government’s priority should be reducing the national debt to ensure fiscal resilience, while making appropriate public investments to enhance the nation’s competitiveness.
Sound fiscal policy is the cornerstone of long-term national development. Only through thoughtful planning can future generations be saved from bearing heavy financial burdens, with the added benefit of a more stable and sustainable economy.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS