Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing.
The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase.
Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s full-year revenue expected to represent an even higher share.
However, when considering actual GDP contribution (value-added impact) — excluding imported equipment and materials — the net effect is estimated to be about 5 or 6 percent.
Additionally, TSMC supports about 1,600 Taiwanese suppliers, highlighting its extensive economic footprint. While Taiwan’s N+1 policy aims to retain cutting-edge technology, overseas expansion might lead to talent outflow, impacting Taiwan’s long-term research and development capabilities.
On the economic front, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry output reached NT$4.3 trillion, accounting for 18 percent of GDP and contributing 60 percent of total exports, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said.
TSMC aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year, driven primarily by surging artificial intelligence (AI)-related demand, with AI server and processor revenue expected to double, reaching 18 percent of total sales, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
However, exports in traditional sectors would remain challenged by China’s real estate downturn and ongoing US-China tensions.
Geopolitically, the US$52.7 billion CHIPS Act aims to reduce the US’ reliance on Taiwanese semiconductors, potentially weakening Taiwan’s strategic leverage.
If TSMC expands globally, Taiwan’s “silicon shield” could be diminished, leading to less global attention to Taiwan’s security.
To navigate these challenges, Taiwan must safeguard its technological leadership, strengthen local research and development, and diversify its industries.
From a “silicon shield” to a “global TSMC,” Taiwan’s future would depend on how well it balances global expansion with domestic competitiveness.
Gary Chen is a former associate research fellow in the Department of International Affairs at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS