Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing.
The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase.
Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s full-year revenue expected to represent an even higher share.
However, when considering actual GDP contribution (value-added impact) — excluding imported equipment and materials — the net effect is estimated to be about 5 or 6 percent.
Additionally, TSMC supports about 1,600 Taiwanese suppliers, highlighting its extensive economic footprint. While Taiwan’s N+1 policy aims to retain cutting-edge technology, overseas expansion might lead to talent outflow, impacting Taiwan’s long-term research and development capabilities.
On the economic front, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry output reached NT$4.3 trillion, accounting for 18 percent of GDP and contributing 60 percent of total exports, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said.
TSMC aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year, driven primarily by surging artificial intelligence (AI)-related demand, with AI server and processor revenue expected to double, reaching 18 percent of total sales, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
However, exports in traditional sectors would remain challenged by China’s real estate downturn and ongoing US-China tensions.
Geopolitically, the US$52.7 billion CHIPS Act aims to reduce the US’ reliance on Taiwanese semiconductors, potentially weakening Taiwan’s strategic leverage.
If TSMC expands globally, Taiwan’s “silicon shield” could be diminished, leading to less global attention to Taiwan’s security.
To navigate these challenges, Taiwan must safeguard its technological leadership, strengthen local research and development, and diversify its industries.
From a “silicon shield” to a “global TSMC,” Taiwan’s future would depend on how well it balances global expansion with domestic competitiveness.
Gary Chen is a former associate research fellow in the Department of International Affairs at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS