Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing.
The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase.
Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s full-year revenue expected to represent an even higher share.
However, when considering actual GDP contribution (value-added impact) — excluding imported equipment and materials — the net effect is estimated to be about 5 or 6 percent.
Additionally, TSMC supports about 1,600 Taiwanese suppliers, highlighting its extensive economic footprint. While Taiwan’s N+1 policy aims to retain cutting-edge technology, overseas expansion might lead to talent outflow, impacting Taiwan’s long-term research and development capabilities.
On the economic front, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry output reached NT$4.3 trillion, accounting for 18 percent of GDP and contributing 60 percent of total exports, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said.
TSMC aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year, driven primarily by surging artificial intelligence (AI)-related demand, with AI server and processor revenue expected to double, reaching 18 percent of total sales, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
However, exports in traditional sectors would remain challenged by China’s real estate downturn and ongoing US-China tensions.
Geopolitically, the US$52.7 billion CHIPS Act aims to reduce the US’ reliance on Taiwanese semiconductors, potentially weakening Taiwan’s strategic leverage.
If TSMC expands globally, Taiwan’s “silicon shield” could be diminished, leading to less global attention to Taiwan’s security.
To navigate these challenges, Taiwan must safeguard its technological leadership, strengthen local research and development, and diversify its industries.
From a “silicon shield” to a “global TSMC,” Taiwan’s future would depend on how well it balances global expansion with domestic competitiveness.
Gary Chen is a former associate research fellow in the Department of International Affairs at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS