Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing.
The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase.
Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s full-year revenue expected to represent an even higher share.
However, when considering actual GDP contribution (value-added impact) — excluding imported equipment and materials — the net effect is estimated to be about 5 or 6 percent.
Additionally, TSMC supports about 1,600 Taiwanese suppliers, highlighting its extensive economic footprint. While Taiwan’s N+1 policy aims to retain cutting-edge technology, overseas expansion might lead to talent outflow, impacting Taiwan’s long-term research and development capabilities.
On the economic front, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry output reached NT$4.3 trillion, accounting for 18 percent of GDP and contributing 60 percent of total exports, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said.
TSMC aims to grow its revenue by more than 20 percent this year, driven primarily by surging artificial intelligence (AI)-related demand, with AI server and processor revenue expected to double, reaching 18 percent of total sales, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
However, exports in traditional sectors would remain challenged by China’s real estate downturn and ongoing US-China tensions.
Geopolitically, the US$52.7 billion CHIPS Act aims to reduce the US’ reliance on Taiwanese semiconductors, potentially weakening Taiwan’s strategic leverage.
If TSMC expands globally, Taiwan’s “silicon shield” could be diminished, leading to less global attention to Taiwan’s security.
To navigate these challenges, Taiwan must safeguard its technological leadership, strengthen local research and development, and diversify its industries.
From a “silicon shield” to a “global TSMC,” Taiwan’s future would depend on how well it balances global expansion with domestic competitiveness.
Gary Chen is a former associate research fellow in the Department of International Affairs at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS