The long-standing issue of nursing shortages, which is also linked to the issue of emergency room (ER) overcrowding, has returned to the spotlight in the past few weeks, with healthcare providers nationwide pleading for help to alleviate the problem.
A case revealed by a nurse on social media on Feb. 21 in which a patient could not be accommodated at a large hospital in southern Taiwan and so had to be transferred to a hospital in Yunlin County, where he died on the same day, particularly caught local media attention and aroused public concern.
Physicians of the Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine have said in a statement that the seriousness of the issue is “unprecedented,” adding that the root cause is insufficient hospital capacity, likely due to a shortage of nurses, which forces hospitals to close off beds, exacerbating the problem of “boarding” — patients admitted to the ER being put on hold, often in hallways, while they wait for a bed.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare last month held three emergency meetings over the ER overcrowding issue, announcing three short-term strategies and two medium-to-long-term reforms to address the problem. However, the ministry has faced a backlash from doctors and nurses saying its measures are impractical and fail to address the immediate problem.
The three strategies are asking medical centers to readjust the proportion of inpatient and ER beds, improving mechanisms for transferring patients between hospitals and encouraging people to get the right level of medical care based on how serious their condition is.
The two reforms are improving nursing personnel preparedness and encouraging hospitals to increase critical care services, as well as readjusting National Health Insurance payments.
The ministry on Monday last week said it is mulling establishing new nurse-patient ratio standards and bonuses for nurses working three shifts in ERs.
The NHI Administration on Friday also announced plans to raise an additional NT$4 billion (US$121.8 million) annually by increasing consultation and nursing care payments in ERs, and fees for high-severity emergency response hospitals to address the ER overcrowding problem.
As part of the plans, hospitals would be required to meet certain standards to receive the increased payments, including increasing nurses’ salaries and reducing impatient boarding.
However, the announcements have received a lukewarm response. For example, a few doctors in hospital management positions have said that the nursing shortage is not due to a decreasing number of registered nurses, as numbers have been growing, but rather due to nurses being less willing to work in hospitals than clinics, nursing facilities and in the private sector, where work conditions are perceived as less stressful and better paid.
Some have expressed support for the administration’s proposed payment plans, as they would provide incentives for doctors and nurses to work in ERs and for hospitals to allocate more personnel and resources to ERs.
However, some have also said the government must produce mechanisms to better regulate the health system to prevent medical centers from being filled up with people with just mild illnesses.
Others, including Taiwan Nursing and Medical Industries Union consultant Chen Yu-feng (陳玉鳳), have expressed concern that wage increases for nurses do not address the problem of ERs being a high-stress working environment. While the ministry has promised to put nurse-patient ratio standards into law, it has yet to do so.
Some doctors have praised the ministry’s quick response to the nursing shortage and overcrowding problem as “heading in the right direction.” However, it remains to be seen how the measures would be implemented and whether they would be effective.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS