After the dramatic events of recent weeks, no one can deny that we are living through a historic moment. The international order is transforming before our eyes, leaving everyone shell-shocked and confused. That sort of radical change is not unprecedented.
A similar moment happened in ancient China. The Qin (秦) state was determined to conquer all its rivals and unify the realm. Its main opponent was the Qi (齊) state. The rulers of Qi knew that they could not oppose Qin alone, so they made an alliance with smaller states. Working together, the coalition successfully countered Qin’s aggression for decades. Sound familiar?
Although that collective defense was working well, the ruler of Qi became arrogant and ambitious. He felt that his small allies were useless. Why not make a powerful friend instead? Qi abandoned its alliance and supported Qin instead. The ruler of Qi thought that if two superpowers cooperated, they could conquer smaller states and divvy up the spoils.
That cynical plan soon went awry. Qin used Qi to help it overrun smaller opponents. At first, Qi gained some territory. However, with its previous allies vanquished, Qi found itself isolated and exposed. Qin then turned on Qi and destroyed it. It turned out that abandoning smaller allies did not secure Qi’s safety. On the contrary, it shattered the delicate balance of power and allowed the aggressor to run rampant.
Now the world faces an eerily similar dilemma. US President Donald Trump has signaled his willingness to abandon the US’ NATO allies and support Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. He seems to think that smaller allies are useless parasites and the US has more to gain by befriending other strong countries.
The cautionary tale of Qi and Qin shows how that could backfire. Since World War II, the US (Qi) has used a coalition of allies to oppose Russia (Qin), which has been extremely successful, providing peace and stability. Now Trump is needlessly discarding that arrangement. Americans might regret the results.
Russian President Vladimir Putin does not hide Russia’s strategic goals. He wants to weaken and eventually dissolve NATO. Without a strong alliance to oppose him, Moscow would intimidate Europe and try to reassert control over former Soviet dominions. If the US abandons its European allies, the resulting power vacuum would embolden Russia, much as Qi’s appeasement inspired Qin to become more belligerent.
The historical parallels between the US and Qi serve as a warning. By abandoning smaller allies, Qi did not become more powerful. It merely helped Qin in its own subjugation. Just as Qin’s conquest led to a brutal and short-lived dynasty that soon collapsed, a Russian victory in Ukraine would lead to an unstable and dangerous new world order. It would signal to other aggressive powers, including China, that countries can use military force to redraw borders with impunity. For Taiwan, the implications of Trump’s U-turn on Ukraine are alarming. No one can predict the outcome of the resulting chaos.
Qi’s failure to uphold a united front against Qin was disastrous self-sabotage. Today, the US faces a similar moment of decision. Would it continue to support democratic allies and deter Russian expansionism, or would it seek temporary benefits by siding with an aggressor?
The lesson from history is clear. A defensive coalition can be effective in keeping a belligerent aggressor under control. When a powerful state abandons smaller allies, disaster can result. The US must reaffirm its commitments to those who dare to stand up against expansionist powers. Otherwise, like Qi, the US might find itself more vulnerable when aggressive rivals make it their prime target.
Bret Hinsch is professor emeritus of the Department of History at Fo Guang University.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS