The administration of US President Donald Trump is bringing significant unpredictability and raising questions about its credibility among its allies, not just in Europe, but also in Asia.
In Europe, NATO countries are rushing to rearm, driven by Russia’s war in Ukraine and fears that they can no longer be sure of US protection. In Asia, most of the US’ allies have taken a wait-and-see approach, coupled with quiet diplomacy, as evidenced by the approach of South Korea, Japan and the Philippines.
Taiwan’s approach has been similar to Europe’s, including ramping up defense spending. In addition, it has been working to re-engineer its bilateral trading relationship with the US onto firmer footing to serve the long-term interests and stable relations of the two countries. That robust approach has demonstrated strong leadership from President William Lai (賴清德) and his administration at a time of significant challenges.
US officials and think tanks have for many years called for Taiwan and Europe to boost their defense spending as a percentage of GDP. That request did not emerge out of a vacuum. China’s rise — growing from a US$390.5 billion economy and spending US$6 billion on defense in 1990 to a US$18.77 trillion economy spending about US$231 billion on defense last year — has significantly changed the strategic landscape in East Asia. While China’s defense spending was about double Taiwan’s (US$11.4 billion versus US$5 billion) in 2000 — a manageable gap given Taiwan’s US backing — its defense budget last year was 12 times the size of Taiwan’s US$19.1 billion, which is less manageable, given the US’ strategic distraction, and decades of neglect in Taiwan’s military reforms and investments.
That has created an unbalanced situation in East Asia and is why the US has been calling for Taiwan to transition to an asymmetric defense strategy, as its historical symmetric, force-on-force approach is neither sustainable nor effective given the resource disparity. Washington also wants Europe to take up more of the defense burden to free up US resources, so it could play a bigger role in Asia to balance against China. That is not unreasonable.
As Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last week about Europe relying too much on the US: “500 million Europeans are asking 300 million Americans to defend them against 140 million Russians... Europe today lacks the belief that we are truly a global force.”
Trump’s unpredictability and the US’ actions on Ukraine bring understandable worries for its democratic allies, and might cause some in Taiwan to question the US’ commitments to the nation as well. However, viewed from another angle, Trump’s policy is finally bringing the structural adjustment needed to engage in long-term strategic competition with China, restore a favorable balance of power in Asia and push back against Beijing’s revisionism. If correctly executed, that could be a positive development for the US and its allies on both continents.
However, regardless of the US’ actions, Taiwanese must get familiar with the mindset that they should take primary responsibility for their nation’s defense, with US help a welcome addendum.
As Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said: “Taiwan must stop asking whether US troops would come to protect us.”
“Protecting our nation is our responsibility,” he said.
Lin’s comments are exactly right.
The dominant mode of this new era of geopolitics is self-reliance in defense, highlighted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen launching the “Rearm Europe” plan on Tuesday. Rather than shirking from that reality, the Lai administration has shown leadership at a challenging time, which should be supported across the political spectrum.
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS