The administration of US President Donald Trump is bringing significant unpredictability and raising questions about its credibility among its allies, not just in Europe, but also in Asia.
In Europe, NATO countries are rushing to rearm, driven by Russia’s war in Ukraine and fears that they can no longer be sure of US protection. In Asia, most of the US’ allies have taken a wait-and-see approach, coupled with quiet diplomacy, as evidenced by the approach of South Korea, Japan and the Philippines.
Taiwan’s approach has been similar to Europe’s, including ramping up defense spending. In addition, it has been working to re-engineer its bilateral trading relationship with the US onto firmer footing to serve the long-term interests and stable relations of the two countries. That robust approach has demonstrated strong leadership from President William Lai (賴清德) and his administration at a time of significant challenges.
US officials and think tanks have for many years called for Taiwan and Europe to boost their defense spending as a percentage of GDP. That request did not emerge out of a vacuum. China’s rise — growing from a US$390.5 billion economy and spending US$6 billion on defense in 1990 to a US$18.77 trillion economy spending about US$231 billion on defense last year — has significantly changed the strategic landscape in East Asia. While China’s defense spending was about double Taiwan’s (US$11.4 billion versus US$5 billion) in 2000 — a manageable gap given Taiwan’s US backing — its defense budget last year was 12 times the size of Taiwan’s US$19.1 billion, which is less manageable, given the US’ strategic distraction, and decades of neglect in Taiwan’s military reforms and investments.
That has created an unbalanced situation in East Asia and is why the US has been calling for Taiwan to transition to an asymmetric defense strategy, as its historical symmetric, force-on-force approach is neither sustainable nor effective given the resource disparity. Washington also wants Europe to take up more of the defense burden to free up US resources, so it could play a bigger role in Asia to balance against China. That is not unreasonable.
As Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last week about Europe relying too much on the US: “500 million Europeans are asking 300 million Americans to defend them against 140 million Russians... Europe today lacks the belief that we are truly a global force.”
Trump’s unpredictability and the US’ actions on Ukraine bring understandable worries for its democratic allies, and might cause some in Taiwan to question the US’ commitments to the nation as well. However, viewed from another angle, Trump’s policy is finally bringing the structural adjustment needed to engage in long-term strategic competition with China, restore a favorable balance of power in Asia and push back against Beijing’s revisionism. If correctly executed, that could be a positive development for the US and its allies on both continents.
However, regardless of the US’ actions, Taiwanese must get familiar with the mindset that they should take primary responsibility for their nation’s defense, with US help a welcome addendum.
As Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said: “Taiwan must stop asking whether US troops would come to protect us.”
“Protecting our nation is our responsibility,” he said.
Lin’s comments are exactly right.
The dominant mode of this new era of geopolitics is self-reliance in defense, highlighted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen launching the “Rearm Europe” plan on Tuesday. Rather than shirking from that reality, the Lai administration has shown leadership at a challenging time, which should be supported across the political spectrum.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS