The administration of US President Donald Trump is bringing significant unpredictability and raising questions about its credibility among its allies, not just in Europe, but also in Asia.
In Europe, NATO countries are rushing to rearm, driven by Russia’s war in Ukraine and fears that they can no longer be sure of US protection. In Asia, most of the US’ allies have taken a wait-and-see approach, coupled with quiet diplomacy, as evidenced by the approach of South Korea, Japan and the Philippines.
Taiwan’s approach has been similar to Europe’s, including ramping up defense spending. In addition, it has been working to re-engineer its bilateral trading relationship with the US onto firmer footing to serve the long-term interests and stable relations of the two countries. That robust approach has demonstrated strong leadership from President William Lai (賴清德) and his administration at a time of significant challenges.
US officials and think tanks have for many years called for Taiwan and Europe to boost their defense spending as a percentage of GDP. That request did not emerge out of a vacuum. China’s rise — growing from a US$390.5 billion economy and spending US$6 billion on defense in 1990 to a US$18.77 trillion economy spending about US$231 billion on defense last year — has significantly changed the strategic landscape in East Asia. While China’s defense spending was about double Taiwan’s (US$11.4 billion versus US$5 billion) in 2000 — a manageable gap given Taiwan’s US backing — its defense budget last year was 12 times the size of Taiwan’s US$19.1 billion, which is less manageable, given the US’ strategic distraction, and decades of neglect in Taiwan’s military reforms and investments.
That has created an unbalanced situation in East Asia and is why the US has been calling for Taiwan to transition to an asymmetric defense strategy, as its historical symmetric, force-on-force approach is neither sustainable nor effective given the resource disparity. Washington also wants Europe to take up more of the defense burden to free up US resources, so it could play a bigger role in Asia to balance against China. That is not unreasonable.
As Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last week about Europe relying too much on the US: “500 million Europeans are asking 300 million Americans to defend them against 140 million Russians... Europe today lacks the belief that we are truly a global force.”
Trump’s unpredictability and the US’ actions on Ukraine bring understandable worries for its democratic allies, and might cause some in Taiwan to question the US’ commitments to the nation as well. However, viewed from another angle, Trump’s policy is finally bringing the structural adjustment needed to engage in long-term strategic competition with China, restore a favorable balance of power in Asia and push back against Beijing’s revisionism. If correctly executed, that could be a positive development for the US and its allies on both continents.
However, regardless of the US’ actions, Taiwanese must get familiar with the mindset that they should take primary responsibility for their nation’s defense, with US help a welcome addendum.
As Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said: “Taiwan must stop asking whether US troops would come to protect us.”
“Protecting our nation is our responsibility,” he said.
Lin’s comments are exactly right.
The dominant mode of this new era of geopolitics is self-reliance in defense, highlighted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen launching the “Rearm Europe” plan on Tuesday. Rather than shirking from that reality, the Lai administration has shown leadership at a challenging time, which should be supported across the political spectrum.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS