The long sweep of Chinese history reveals interesting patterns, and one stands out in particular: It is striking how many great Chinese met tragic ends. Time and again, China’s rulers persecuted brilliant individuals.
Emperors were usually ordinary men of average ability, so they had no choice but to depend on people whose talents far surpassed their own. However, they often mistrusted subordinates who were far more competent than themselves. Emperors needed talent, but feared it, a contradiction that brought many brilliant people to bitter ends.
In both past and present-day China, countless talented Chinese have experienced persecution. Some cases seem remarkably similar. Today’s China might have a veneer of modernity, but their society still grapples with its ancient authoritarian legacy.
Han Xin (韓信), a military genius instrumental in establishing the Han Dynasty, is universally ranked as one of the greatest generals in Chinese history. The renowned ancient historian Sima Qian (司馬遷) called him “A man without equal in the realm — the foremost among generals.”
A master strategist, Han’s victories on the battlefield laid the groundwork for a new era. More than anyone else, he was responsible for establishing the new dynasty and making Han Gaozu (漢高祖) emperor. However, his extraordinary talent became his undoing. Gaozu felt insecure ruling over an unstable new dynasty, making him wary of potential threats, and began to consider Han Xin as a menace who had to be eliminated. Eventually, he had Han Xin executed.
The tragic downfall of one of China’s greatest strategists highlights a sad truth — rulers of middling talent have always feared outstanding ability. When talent casts too long a shadow, they root it out.
In the 21st century, a remarkably similar case is seen in entrepreneur Jack Ma (馬雲). A list of the most creative entrepreneurs of the modern era would place Ma near the top. China once celebrated Ma as a pioneering business genius whose innovations transformed global commerce.
However, success made him bold and outspoken. He rightly considered the dead hand of the Chinese Communist Party the major impediment to China’s economic growth. Hoping to move his country forward as quickly as possible, he publicly criticized glaring flaws in government policies. As a result, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) began to consider Ma a threat. He feared that such a wealthy and celebrated magnate would create a power base to rival his own.
Like Han Xin, Ma’s brilliance brought retribution. Xi had Ma dismissed from the company he founded, silenced and exiled.
What unites the narratives of Han Xin and Ma is not just the tragic fate of two brilliant men, but also the cruel imperatives of authoritarianism that destroyed them. In ancient and modern times, rulers of limited ability fear talent. They feel comfortable around obedient mediocrities and suspect anyone who challenges the “status quo.”
The tragic stories of Han Xin and Ma remind us that authoritarian leaders in every era mistrust genius. They see exceptional talent not as a resource to be nurtured, but as a threat to their precarious hold on power. As the Chinese saying goes, there cannot be two suns in the sky.
Han Xin and Ma operated in entirely different spheres — one on the battlefield and one in the boardroom. However, their stories converge on a critical point: Authoritarian regimes, by their very nature, undermine the excellence that might propel society forward. They punish people for daring to excel, sacrificing talent on the altar of absolute power.
Authoritarianism not only crushes the human spirit, but also dooms society to mediocrity. The question facing China’s elite is — who is next?
Bret Hinsch is professor emeritus of the Department of History, Fo Guang University.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS