The long sweep of Chinese history reveals interesting patterns, and one stands out in particular: It is striking how many great Chinese met tragic ends. Time and again, China’s rulers persecuted brilliant individuals.
Emperors were usually ordinary men of average ability, so they had no choice but to depend on people whose talents far surpassed their own. However, they often mistrusted subordinates who were far more competent than themselves. Emperors needed talent, but feared it, a contradiction that brought many brilliant people to bitter ends.
In both past and present-day China, countless talented Chinese have experienced persecution. Some cases seem remarkably similar. Today’s China might have a veneer of modernity, but their society still grapples with its ancient authoritarian legacy.
Han Xin (韓信), a military genius instrumental in establishing the Han Dynasty, is universally ranked as one of the greatest generals in Chinese history. The renowned ancient historian Sima Qian (司馬遷) called him “A man without equal in the realm — the foremost among generals.”
A master strategist, Han’s victories on the battlefield laid the groundwork for a new era. More than anyone else, he was responsible for establishing the new dynasty and making Han Gaozu (漢高祖) emperor. However, his extraordinary talent became his undoing. Gaozu felt insecure ruling over an unstable new dynasty, making him wary of potential threats, and began to consider Han Xin as a menace who had to be eliminated. Eventually, he had Han Xin executed.
The tragic downfall of one of China’s greatest strategists highlights a sad truth — rulers of middling talent have always feared outstanding ability. When talent casts too long a shadow, they root it out.
In the 21st century, a remarkably similar case is seen in entrepreneur Jack Ma (馬雲). A list of the most creative entrepreneurs of the modern era would place Ma near the top. China once celebrated Ma as a pioneering business genius whose innovations transformed global commerce.
However, success made him bold and outspoken. He rightly considered the dead hand of the Chinese Communist Party the major impediment to China’s economic growth. Hoping to move his country forward as quickly as possible, he publicly criticized glaring flaws in government policies. As a result, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) began to consider Ma a threat. He feared that such a wealthy and celebrated magnate would create a power base to rival his own.
Like Han Xin, Ma’s brilliance brought retribution. Xi had Ma dismissed from the company he founded, silenced and exiled.
What unites the narratives of Han Xin and Ma is not just the tragic fate of two brilliant men, but also the cruel imperatives of authoritarianism that destroyed them. In ancient and modern times, rulers of limited ability fear talent. They feel comfortable around obedient mediocrities and suspect anyone who challenges the “status quo.”
The tragic stories of Han Xin and Ma remind us that authoritarian leaders in every era mistrust genius. They see exceptional talent not as a resource to be nurtured, but as a threat to their precarious hold on power. As the Chinese saying goes, there cannot be two suns in the sky.
Han Xin and Ma operated in entirely different spheres — one on the battlefield and one in the boardroom. However, their stories converge on a critical point: Authoritarian regimes, by their very nature, undermine the excellence that might propel society forward. They punish people for daring to excel, sacrificing talent on the altar of absolute power.
Authoritarianism not only crushes the human spirit, but also dooms society to mediocrity. The question facing China’s elite is — who is next?
Bret Hinsch is professor emeritus of the Department of History, Fo Guang University.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant