US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem.
The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means — massive capital investment, technological innovation and an unwavering commitment to manufacturing excellence. Taiwan did not take anything from the US — it developed specialized expertise that complemented US companies’ strategic decision to focus on chip design.
That division of labor has created one of the most successful technological partnerships in history. US companies such as Apple, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices maintain their global leadership in chip design while relying on Taiwan’s unparalleled manufacturing capabilities. That arrangement has driven innovation, reduced costs for consumers and maintained the two sides’ technological competitiveness against rising global challengers.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry has consistently demonstrated its commitment to supporting US manufacturing. TSMC’s US$40 billion investment in Arizona represents one of the largest foreign direct investments in US history. The first facility is already operational, with a second under construction. These investments create thousands of high-paying jobs while transferring crucial technological expertise to the US.
It is not just about maintaining good relations; it is a strategic decision that strengthens both economies. By establishing manufacturing facilities in the US, Taiwan’s chip industry helps address US supply chain concerns while maintaining its position as a global technology leader. That approach demonstrates how Taiwan can support US industrial policy goals while preserving its technological advantages.
Trump’s proposed 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made chips present a significant risk. For US consumers, such measures would dramatically increase prices for electronics, from smartphones to automotive systems. The US chip industry, which has built its global leadership around the ability to access Taiwan’s advanced manufacturing capabilities, would face disrupted supply chains and potentially lose ground to international competitors.
For Taiwan, while its advanced manufacturing capabilities provide some insulation from immediate impact, the long-term implications of US protectionism could be significant. However, it is crucial to understand that semiconductor manufacturing cannot be relocated overnight. The industry requires not just massive capital investment, but also decades of accumulated expertise and a sophisticated ecosystem of suppliers and skilled workers.
The semiconductor industry exists within a complex geopolitical landscape. Taiwan’s position as an indispensable partner in global technology production strengthens its international standing and security. Its leadership is not merely an economic asset — it is a crucial element of its strategic importance in the Indo-Pacific region.
Maintaining strong technological partnerships with the US serves both sides’ interests in preserving regional stability. As tensions with China continue, the interdependence created by the semiconductor partnership provides a concrete foundation for continued US support of Taiwan.
Rather than retreating from partnership in response to protectionist rhetoric, Taiwan should focus on deepening collaboration with the US. Technology transfer initiatives should expand beyond building fabs in the US, increasing knowledge-sharing programs between Taiwanese and US institutions. A crucial component of that collaboration should be the establishment of joint training programs that leverage Taiwan’s manufacturing expertise to develop skilled semiconductor workers in both territories. Furthermore, creating more resilient semiconductor supply chains requires coordinated investments in both sides’ industrial capabilities. Efforts should be complemented by joint research in next-generation semiconductor technologies, ensuring continued technological advancement.
Taiwan’s government understands the strategic importance of its semiconductor partnership. Policies should continue to support investment in US manufacturing while maintaining technological leadership. Enhanced incentive programs for Taiwanese companies to establish facilities in the US should be coupled with strengthened research collaboration. That approach, combined with robust intellectual property protections and sustained investment in semiconductor talent development, would ensure the long-term viability of the partnership.
Despite political rhetoric, market realities favor continued collaboration. The semiconductor industry’s complexity and capital-intensive nature makes it impossible for any single economy to achieve full self-sufficiency. The future lies in strategic partnerships that leverage strengths while ensuring supply chain resilience.
TSMC’s leadership in advanced manufacturing processes, coupled with US companies’ dominance in chip design, creates a partnership that is greater than the sum of its parts. That combination has proven remarkably successful in driving innovation and maintaining competitiveness.
The Taiwan-US semiconductor partnership represents one of the most successful examples of international technological collaboration in history. Rather than viewing US efforts to strengthen domestic manufacturing as a threat, it should be seen as an opportunity for deeper partnership.
This is not a zero-sum game — it is a partnership that has consistently delivered technological progress and economic benefits for both parties.
The future of the semiconductor industry is built on cooperation, not confrontation. By maintaining technological leadership and supporting US partners, Taiwan ensures its continued importance in the global technology ecosystem. That is the true story of the Taiwan-US chip partnership — not one of competition or theft, but of shared success through strategic collaboration and mutual respect.
Y. Tony Yang is an endowed professor and associate dean at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS