The mass recall movement targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators has become an invincible civic movement. Instead of calling upon his party members to make amends before it is too late, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) put the cart before the horse — those who plant the mines blame those who tried to remove them.
Obviously, Chu is not trying to tell his party’s lawmakers to stop messing around. He urged President William Lai (賴清德) to stop this mass recall campaign, which reflects his and his party’s lack of democratic temperament.
The KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) act wantonly in the legislature. They are the cause of chaos. The electorate, not being able to recall the TPP’s legislators-at-large, has no choice but to vent their anger on KMT legislators by mass recalls. It is the consequence that they have to bear.
Chu is reversing cause and effect, chickening out in admitting the KMT’s own actions, just as his party refused to apologize for the 228 Incident and urging everyone to “look forward not backward” and not to “polarize the community.”
Is Chu aware that the opposition party should be overseen by the voters, as well as the opposition overseeing the ruling party? For an opposition party, the best would be to deliver excellent views, nurture outstanding talents and be ready to replace the ruling party. The second best would be to oversee the ruling party as a responsible opposition party without possessing the ability to rule. The worst would be to indulge in self-inflation and abuse its power. It would not care about upending the political landscape, ruining the constitutional system or scourging the nation.
This mass recall campaign aims at troublemakers who are already the public’s enemy, giving the opposition party a wake-up call.
What people want is an effective administration, but not a paralyzed one. To oversee a government is not to tie its hands to impede its action. An opposition party that only knows how to cause obstruction is not doing its job properly.
In a democratic country, an electorate oversees the ruling party and the opposition with their votes. This is what the electorate is doing to stop KMT legislators from slashing budgets for national defense and the domestic submarine project, cutting the central government’s annual budget, and rejecting nominees for the Constitutional Court, immobilizing it.
The legislature has turned into a monster. There is no reason to stop the mass recall campaign.
During recess or before a legislative session begins, KMT lawmakers did not go to democratic countries such as the US, Japan or European countries that are friendly to Taiwan. Instead, they flocked to communist China that covets Taiwan’s sovereign territory.
What did KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) talk about with Chinese officials when he was, as he put it, “representing Taiwan’s central government”? What promises did he make? This is something that could have led to his execution during the administration of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國).
KMT legislators argued that they do not have to report in advance or afterward. Is this acceptable?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Fion Khan
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS