Recently, several Facebook groups have shared a post by someone named Wayne Boyle, which says that the participation of Palauan officials in last week’s Halifax International Security Forum (HFX) in Taipei might contravene Beijing’s “one China” principle. The post emphasized that Palau should not become a bargaining chip in Taiwan’s confrontation with China. The post notes that its author is a “New Zealand journalist,” but upon investigation, the account has no prior post history aside from this article. It is possible that it is a fake account, created for the purpose of forming a “consensus” by sharing the post to other accounts and groups, thereby successfully manipulating public opinion through information warfare.
HFX is a globally renowned security conference that discusses democratic values, international security and strategic issues in the Indo-Pacific region. The forum was held in Canada in November last year, where the 2020 John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service was awarded to former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in recognition of her contributions.
This move triggered strong protests from China, which criticized it as an infringement of its “one China” principle. On Thursday and Friday last week, the forum was held in Taiwan for the first time, further strengthening Taiwan’s international diplomacy and highlighting China’s hostility toward the forum.
Palau is a diplomatic ally of Taiwan — the two countries have cooperated in the areas of healthcare, economics, education and more. Taiwan has assisted Palau in constructing medical facilities, dispatched medical teams to provide aid and enhanced local infrastructure through technical cooperation projects.
Furthermore, Palau has voiced its support for Taiwan in international forums, including openly advocating for Taiwan’s increased international participation at the UN General Assembly. This relationship has provided Taiwan and Palau with a certain degree of mutual trust and cooperation on diplomatic and regional security issues.
However, this widely circulated Facebook post deliberately emphasized that Palau should take a “cautious” diplomatic stance, even suggesting that Palau’s strong relationship with Taiwan has led to a drop in Chinese tourists to the country, thereby impacting its economic development. It further argues that the Palauan government should — in protecting its national interests — appropriately handle its relationship with China, rather than becoming a victim of the Taiwan Strait issue.
However, the article fails to clearly specify what kind of unnecessary political pressure Palau is facing, nor does it explain which party is engaging in said coercion and inducement. Instead, it uses vague language to lead readers into believing that Palau should not have sent officials to participate in the HFX Taipei forum — which has no real influence — attempting to sow uncertainty in the Taiwan-Palau relationship.
Taiwan and Palau’s friendship is solid, and the two countries’ official interactions and exchanges are normal diplomatic activities that should not be influenced by such vaguely positioned articles. Such narratives that easily mislead readers and create unnecessary trouble are a common tactic in information warfare. Given the presently changing situation in the Indo-Pacific region, we must exercise more caution when judging content that deliberately blurs the focus and creates a divisive atmosphere to prevent the manipulation of public opinion.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS