Recently, a Chinese-produced beer brand has attracted attention for its advertisements in major stores in Taiwan that seemingly use the Republic of China (ROC) flag as a background. Since using the national flag typically symbolizes domestic brands, consumers that do not carefully examine the product’s label for its origin might mistakenly believe that the beer was made in Taiwan, which might impact their purchasing decisions.
That issue not only involves the protection of consumers’ rights and interests, but also highlights gaps in the labeling management of imported alcohol.
According to the Tobacco and Alcohol Administration Act (菸酒管理法), alcohol containers must clearly indicate the “country of origin” and “no false or misleading statements may be made in the labeling on the container or the external packaging or brochures of alcohol products.”
In response, the Taipei City Government said that it reached out to the company for clarification, and would handle the matter in accordance with the law to protect consumer rights and market order.
Government departments also emphasized that the Ministry of Finance has clear regulations regarding alcohol labeling, including Article 32 of the act, which requires complete and transparent labeling of products, and Article 37, which restricts advertisements containing “content that is deceptive, exaggerated, fabricated, or easily misinterpreted.” If an investigation confirms any contravention of the law, the issue would be handled accordingly.
That incident has given rise to discussions regarding politics and fair market competition. Some people say that imported products have an obligation to have strong labeling management, to uphold consumer rights and prevent imported goods from employing marketing tactics that intentionally obscure a product’s country of origin, thereby influencing consumers’ decisions.
Others are concerned about whether Taiwan should impose stricter regulatory standards on Chinese imports to prevent a lack of transparency in product information from causing an unfair market competition.
In the past, the labeling practices of other imported alcoholic beverages have sparked controversy, and that recent beer incident again highlights the severity of such issues.
The authorities have intervened in the investigation and how the matter is handled would influence the regulatory trends for the labeling of imported alcoholic beverages.
If regulations are strengthened, future reviews of alcohol labeling and advertisements might become more stringent. Conversely, if little action is taken to handle the issue, similar problems might recur, potentially undermining consumer rights and threatening the market order.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
RSS