The Ministry of Education on Wednesday announced that it would no longer recognize qualifications from three Chinese universities found to be arms of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) United Front Work Department.
Ignoring the reality of the CCP’s and military harassment against, and ambitions for the annexation of, the nation, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said: “Academics should be left to academics, education should be left to education.”
Huang harshly criticized the government for anti-China, pro-Taiwan rhetoric, thereby harming students in the process.
The reality is that, under the CCP’s one-party authoritarian system, even the highest-ranked Chinese universities must adhere to the principle that the party leads the school. The “About” page on Peking University’s Web site lists its CCP chairman He Guangcai (何光彩) before the president, Gong Qihuang (龔旗煌). It is evident that the party chairman is above the president.
Gong is also vice chair of the Peking University Council, which further proves that the president is second in command to the chairman. In Chinese top-ranked universities, it is abundantly clear who holds more power between the council and the president — there is a well-defined hierarchy.
The organizational structures of other universities, such as Beijing’s Tsinghua University and Shanghai’s Fudan University, are no different. As for the three blacklisted “united front” universities — Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, Jinan University in Guangzhou, and the Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College — there is even less to say. The facts are right before our eyes. Under the CCP’s rule, academics serve a political purpose. Where did Huang get the ridiculous idea that the two are unrelated?
Ultimately, the reason why academics are not simply academics and education is not simply education is due to the CCP’s “Party leads everything” ideology and its authoritarian system, using politics to oppress academics.
In the face of the CCP’s “united front” offensive, the ministry is merely exercising its right to protect hardworking Taiwanese students from being brainwashed. That is a good thing. However, Huang is turning a blind eye to the CCP’s covert “united front” tactics, remaining willfully ignorant. He even had the nerve to criticize the government’s well-intentioned protection of students against the CCP’s brainwashing and infiltration — it is foolish and malicious.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS