The Ministry of Education on Wednesday announced that it would no longer recognize qualifications from three Chinese universities found to be arms of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) United Front Work Department.
Ignoring the reality of the CCP’s and military harassment against, and ambitions for the annexation of, the nation, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said: “Academics should be left to academics, education should be left to education.”
Huang harshly criticized the government for anti-China, pro-Taiwan rhetoric, thereby harming students in the process.
The reality is that, under the CCP’s one-party authoritarian system, even the highest-ranked Chinese universities must adhere to the principle that the party leads the school. The “About” page on Peking University’s Web site lists its CCP chairman He Guangcai (何光彩) before the president, Gong Qihuang (龔旗煌). It is evident that the party chairman is above the president.
Gong is also vice chair of the Peking University Council, which further proves that the president is second in command to the chairman. In Chinese top-ranked universities, it is abundantly clear who holds more power between the council and the president — there is a well-defined hierarchy.
The organizational structures of other universities, such as Beijing’s Tsinghua University and Shanghai’s Fudan University, are no different. As for the three blacklisted “united front” universities — Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, Jinan University in Guangzhou, and the Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College — there is even less to say. The facts are right before our eyes. Under the CCP’s rule, academics serve a political purpose. Where did Huang get the ridiculous idea that the two are unrelated?
Ultimately, the reason why academics are not simply academics and education is not simply education is due to the CCP’s “Party leads everything” ideology and its authoritarian system, using politics to oppress academics.
In the face of the CCP’s “united front” offensive, the ministry is merely exercising its right to protect hardworking Taiwanese students from being brainwashed. That is a good thing. However, Huang is turning a blind eye to the CCP’s covert “united front” tactics, remaining willfully ignorant. He even had the nerve to criticize the government’s well-intentioned protection of students against the CCP’s brainwashing and infiltration — it is foolish and malicious.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS