The world’s fastest-growing major advanced economy last year was most likely Spain. According to preliminary official data for last year, Spain’s GDP grew by 3.2 percent, almost five times the eurozone average and more than the US, which did pretty well too. In December last year, The Economist ranked Spain first among 37 mostly wealthy countries based on five indicators: GDP, stock market performance, core inflation, unemployment and government deficits. Forecasts for this year look good.
Why is Spain doing so well? One key reason is immigration. Recent population flows, particularly but not only from Colombia, Venezuela and other Latin American countries, as well as Morocco, have boosted domestic demand and rejuvenated the workforce. According to the main national labor survey, nearly 90 percent of new jobs were filled by workers of foreign origin or dual nationality. Unemployment is at its lowest level since 2007.
Spain’s growth is driven by a wide range of factors: A booming tourism industry; public investment supported by the EU’s pandemic recovery funds; rising services and industrial exports to the European single market and beyond (especially since 2021); the growth of financial and technology businesses; and low energy costs thanks to Spain’s expansion of renewables. Some of the labor reforms enacted by the center-left coalition government have also put more money into low-income consumers’ pockets — notably the steady increase in the minimum wage, which has risen more than 50 percent since Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, took office in 2018.
While the weight of each of these factors remains debated, migration is still the most frequently cited reason for Spain’s strong performance and perhaps its most distinctive advantage compared with other countries. Immigration has also visibly changed Spain in recent years, particularly in major cities. Madrid, for instance, now has more than 1 million residents from Latin America — up from just 80,000 only 25 years ago.
Anecdotal evidence shows this transformation. In my own neighborhood in central Madrid, the most popular bookstore is run by two Argentinian journalists; the cool artisan bakery that keeps expanding was cofounded by a Hungarian woman who moved her business from Budapest. A Latin American evangelical church rents an old adult cinema for its worship and gatherings; a traditional Spanish pastry shop has started selling Venezuelan delicacies next to the long queue that forms every other day outside the consulate. Not far away, a large sign supports the party of Argentinian President Javier Milei (with graffiti from his detractors scrawled across it).
Not all the economic data tells a rosy story. Spain still struggles with low productivity, an overreliance on the public sector and low wages (GDP per capita has not grown as much as GDP), even if it has improved in these measures too. Tourism, while a driving force for the economy, has exacerbated housing shortages and fueled a backlash against visitors, short-term rental platforms and investment funds pushing locals out of the city centers.
Immigration has added to the pressure on affordable housing, with demand outpacing supply as the population grows. Some politicians blame rich Venezuelan and Colombian buyers for the rising prices in the most expensive neighborhoods of Madrid. Poorer immigrants, particularly those from North African countries, continue to face discrimination and exploitation by unscrupulous and criminal employers or landlords. Meanwhile, regional and national politicians are often locked in disputes over housing migrant minors who have arrived in Spain alone.
Yet despite these challenges, being a richer country, in cash terms and in diversity, is an enviable position in Europe, especially when Spain is compared to struggling economies like those of Germany and the UK.
Stormier times may lie ahead. Some European neighbors remain economically weak, and global demand could shrink if US President Donald Trump launches a transatlantic trade war. If a crisis of the scale of the 2008 crash were to recur, immigrants could return to their countries of origin, leaving Spain with an aging population and a dwindling workforce to support pensions and public services.
For now, even if it is not perfect, Spain stands as a model for how migration could energize an economy and a society. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other leaders of low-growth economies running out of ideas should take note. Ideological rigidity against foreign-born workers is not just xenophobic, it is economically shortsighted.
Maria Ramirez is a journalist and deputy managing editor of elDiario.es, a news outlet in Spain.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS