The government’s annual tax surplus last year exceeded NT$528.3 billion (US$16.16 billion), setting an unprecedented record, Ministry of Finance data showed.
To reduce the pressure of recalls, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus has announced a “return money to the people 2.0” campaign for this legislative session, demanding that the government provide every citizen with NT$10,000 in tax surplus revenue.
In response, the ministry said the tax surplus should be used to reduce the government debt, adding that using the surplus for cash handouts would be inappropriate.
The ministry is right. I also disagree with the cash handouts. The real meaning of the so-called “tax surplus” is that the tax collection is higher than the original estimate.
The tax surplus does not mean there is a “fiscal surplus.” The country has neither made any undue gains nor was there any unnecessary increase in taxes exceeding what should have originally been collected.
If the KMT’s plan is implemented, the total amount of money disbursed to citizens would exceed NT$230 billion. That could negatively impact Taiwan’s national finances, and to be frank, the nation’s financial situation is already one of heavy debt — the government is barely able to make ends meet as it is.
On the surface, returning a portion of the tax surplus to the public might appear to be returning people’s money. However, given that each person’s tax contribution is different, how can the government return the tax fairly? Attempting to do so might affect the basic function of tax collection.
Essentially, taxation also means allowing wealthier people make greater contributions to society — the so-called “ability to pay” principle. If the government has to distribute the surplus to the public evenly, would such a practice not contradict the basic function of tax affordability? Not to mention it would also be unfair to some taxpayers.
It should also be taken into consideration that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the nation repeatedly issued public bonds just to raise funds for relief and prevention. Taiwan’s public debt significantly increased as a result. As the government finds itself in this poor financial situation, how can it arbitrarily spend its tax surplus?
If the government spreads the money around now just because it has a slight increase in tax revenue, is this not leaving the responsibility of handling the national debt to future generations? It should not be forgotten that the money in the national treasury ultimately belongs to Taiwanese. If that money is spent recklessly, the public would be forced to bear the consequences.
The government has failed to handle other policies — such as the adjustment of the military service system, as well as subsidies for the labor and health insurance funds — that are in urgent need of more funding. Returning the surplus is short-sighted and lacks an overall vision — that is not a blessing for the country.
Opposition legislators have joined hands to amend the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), which would provide more funding to local governments. That move is estimated to increase the total revenue of the local governments by more than NT$370 billion.
Due to the amendment, after the central government’s total budget was cut, many government agencies do not even have enough in service fees.
Meanwhile, Taiwan Power Co’s huge financial losses remain unresolved and the national defense budget has even been affected. All these problems could be solved with the proper use of the surplus.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS