The explosion on the 12th floor of the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung on Thursday is different from the fire that occurred at an under-construction PX Mart processing facility in the city on Dec. 19 last year, because the former was more than an issue of worksite safety. It involved shoppers and diners inside the building, and pedestrians walking on the street, impacting public safety more broadly. Responsibility for the explosion should be elevated to the government and not limited to the construction contractors and enterprises involved.
Consumers should be especially careful when construction work is under way, as confined spaces such as malls and factories not only carry an outsized disaster risk, but the occurrence of such a disaster could affect many more victims. It is necessary to bring in resources to enhance management, as well as carry out risk control. Small-scale contractors should not be allowed to solely rely on their knowledge and capabilities to conduct fire or explosion prevention measures.
The key to mitigating disaster risks rests with the owners of contracting businesses and enterprises. They must be equipped with knowledge on how to handle disaster and injury risks, and they need to implement feasible disaster prevention and mitigation measures. General management for businesses must establish disaster risk identification systems, and incorporate disaster prevention and mitigation standards into operations.
The risk of a fire breaking out exists everywhere. The only difference is the degree of that risk and whether a space carries a high or low fire risk. The Taichung branch of Shin Kong Mitsukoshi set a precedent for shopping centers by establishing a “director of safety and security” position in 2018, yet a review of Thursday’s explosion showed that it was reminiscent of the 2019 Kyoto Animation studio arson attack.
The Taichung Fire Department’s fire prevention and evacuation guidelines recognize that even if a space passes safety inspections and has official approval, there is always a high likelihood that evacuation measures could fail.
For a long time, Taiwanese have seen public safety as black-and-white, with the mindset that if standards and situations conform to laws and regulations, a fire would not break out. They do not consider the greatest variable in those situations — the human element.
Furthermore, it is impossible to invest unlimited resources into prevention, damage mitigation equipment and practices, human resources and improvement plans. What we can and should do is fix our conceptions. The mindset that disasters cannot occur is unrealistic.
In the face of a disaster, everyone is on equal footing — anyone could get injured or lose their life. The heavy lifting needed for disaster prevention or mitigation for an entire space cannot be placed solely on the shoulders of a small number of disaster relief units, experts or academics dedicated to improving public safety and risk management. Instead, all of society should gain awareness, reflect and change by learning from previous disasters.
Ray Lee is a project researcher with the Taiwan chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS