Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping global power dynamics and those of us in the Global South — from Africa and the Caribbean to Southeast Asia and South America — must seize this moment to advance a community-driven approach to the ascending technology.
Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) stand at a crossroads with AI: It could become a mechanism for asserting our sovereignty and delivering inclusive prosperity, or the latest tool of colonization and exploitation. For centuries, our labor, natural resources and knowledge systems have been used to fuel progress in the Global North. The development and deployment of AI could follow that pattern, leaving LMICs without a stake in the technologies that would underpin our collective prosperity and ability to thrive.
However, LMICs have an opportunity to avert that outcome. We already have the talent, resources and vision to ensure that AI meets our needs. With increased coordination, investment in distributed computing and grassroots innovation, we can establish a fairer technological order that creates value for Global South communities, strengthens their agency and solves the most pressing challenges facing the planet.
Similar to colonial economies, the tech industry is fundamentally extractive. Modern AI systems, whether built by OpenAI or Meta, rely on data labeled by people in LMICs, but the Global North retains control of the industry and its profits, relegating Global South populations to the role of passive participants with high usage rates, rather than as innovators or equal actors.
Moreover, an estimated 2.6 billion people — one-third of the global population — are digitally unconnected and thus unaccounted for in the training of large language models such as the one powering ChatGPT. That reinforces Western-centric worldviews that dismiss our challenges, erase our histories and stifle our potential.
Unless we take urgent action, the Global North would continue to dominate AI and develop new forms of economic and cultural dependency, widening the chasm between those who shape the future and those who are shaped by it. To move beyond colonial patterns of dependence, we must harness the potential of our youthful, digitally native populations, rather than chasing the largest models or building supercomputers. In that sense, the absence of legacy infrastructure, often framed as a barrier to innovation, is actually our biggest strength. Unburdened by outdated systems and rigid processes, we can build lean, purpose-driven data architectures that align with our needs and principles of data sovereignty.
Converting scarcity into innovation begins with education. That could mean introducing mandatory coding classes at schools or creating AI literacy programs to build a digitally fluent workforce. In Vietnam, for example, children are taught to code starting in third grade.
Developing local foundation models and open-source deep-tech tools, such as Amini’s Earth Science Foundation Model or Lelapa AI’s Vulavula, would be equally important. That requires maximizing resources and harnessing the benefits of Global North models while moving beyond them — similar to how DeepSeek challenged OpenAI’s dominance by focusing on efficiency instead of large-scale computing.
Embracing global technologies does not mean accepting them without question — we must also be prepared to create our own innovation ecosystem. Government programs, tax policies and other measures are critical for supporting bottom-up initiatives in LMICs. Singapore has established one of the world’s most successful start-up ecosystems partly through targeted investment and economic incentives.
Even as we chart our own path, our communities and technologists should engage in efforts to shape global AI ethics, localization and governance, which requires establishing meaningful, equitable and collaborative partnerships. And we should not hesitate to forswear initiatives that undermine our freedom to develop and use locally relevant technology. For example, the “green AI” and “frugal AI” movements imply that our developers cannot be trusted to make sustainable choices. However, the high adoption rate of localized technologies such as Edge AI Foundation (formerly tinyML) in African countries shows that locally applied AI can create outsize, sustainable value at home and globally.
LMICs must act collectively to determine the best way to develop shared AI infrastructure and pool resources. To create a robust, secure and inclusive ecosystem, some countries can host data centers, while others can build distributed computer nodes and processing centers. Resources must likewise be shared among the countries producing, transforming and buying data, backstopped by targeted government initiatives that call for using local, rather than global, computational power and resources. Such a collaborative framework requires open dialogue, knowledge-sharing and mutual support.
The question was never whether we in the Global South can “catch up” with the Global North’s AI dominance; it is whether we would use the technology as an equalizer to build a better world. LMICs have already started down this path, which suggests that the real AI revolution is to unfold in Accra, Sao Paulo, Nairobi and Jakarta, not in Silicon Valley. That is how it should be, because a data-rich, community-driven and inclusive AI ecosystem in the Global South benefits everyone.
Kate Kallot is the founder and CEO of Amini.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS