Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping global power dynamics and those of us in the Global South — from Africa and the Caribbean to Southeast Asia and South America — must seize this moment to advance a community-driven approach to the ascending technology.
Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) stand at a crossroads with AI: It could become a mechanism for asserting our sovereignty and delivering inclusive prosperity, or the latest tool of colonization and exploitation. For centuries, our labor, natural resources and knowledge systems have been used to fuel progress in the Global North. The development and deployment of AI could follow that pattern, leaving LMICs without a stake in the technologies that would underpin our collective prosperity and ability to thrive.
However, LMICs have an opportunity to avert that outcome. We already have the talent, resources and vision to ensure that AI meets our needs. With increased coordination, investment in distributed computing and grassroots innovation, we can establish a fairer technological order that creates value for Global South communities, strengthens their agency and solves the most pressing challenges facing the planet.
Similar to colonial economies, the tech industry is fundamentally extractive. Modern AI systems, whether built by OpenAI or Meta, rely on data labeled by people in LMICs, but the Global North retains control of the industry and its profits, relegating Global South populations to the role of passive participants with high usage rates, rather than as innovators or equal actors.
Moreover, an estimated 2.6 billion people — one-third of the global population — are digitally unconnected and thus unaccounted for in the training of large language models such as the one powering ChatGPT. That reinforces Western-centric worldviews that dismiss our challenges, erase our histories and stifle our potential.
Unless we take urgent action, the Global North would continue to dominate AI and develop new forms of economic and cultural dependency, widening the chasm between those who shape the future and those who are shaped by it. To move beyond colonial patterns of dependence, we must harness the potential of our youthful, digitally native populations, rather than chasing the largest models or building supercomputers. In that sense, the absence of legacy infrastructure, often framed as a barrier to innovation, is actually our biggest strength. Unburdened by outdated systems and rigid processes, we can build lean, purpose-driven data architectures that align with our needs and principles of data sovereignty.
Converting scarcity into innovation begins with education. That could mean introducing mandatory coding classes at schools or creating AI literacy programs to build a digitally fluent workforce. In Vietnam, for example, children are taught to code starting in third grade.
Developing local foundation models and open-source deep-tech tools, such as Amini’s Earth Science Foundation Model or Lelapa AI’s Vulavula, would be equally important. That requires maximizing resources and harnessing the benefits of Global North models while moving beyond them — similar to how DeepSeek challenged OpenAI’s dominance by focusing on efficiency instead of large-scale computing.
Embracing global technologies does not mean accepting them without question — we must also be prepared to create our own innovation ecosystem. Government programs, tax policies and other measures are critical for supporting bottom-up initiatives in LMICs. Singapore has established one of the world’s most successful start-up ecosystems partly through targeted investment and economic incentives.
Even as we chart our own path, our communities and technologists should engage in efforts to shape global AI ethics, localization and governance, which requires establishing meaningful, equitable and collaborative partnerships. And we should not hesitate to forswear initiatives that undermine our freedom to develop and use locally relevant technology. For example, the “green AI” and “frugal AI” movements imply that our developers cannot be trusted to make sustainable choices. However, the high adoption rate of localized technologies such as Edge AI Foundation (formerly tinyML) in African countries shows that locally applied AI can create outsize, sustainable value at home and globally.
LMICs must act collectively to determine the best way to develop shared AI infrastructure and pool resources. To create a robust, secure and inclusive ecosystem, some countries can host data centers, while others can build distributed computer nodes and processing centers. Resources must likewise be shared among the countries producing, transforming and buying data, backstopped by targeted government initiatives that call for using local, rather than global, computational power and resources. Such a collaborative framework requires open dialogue, knowledge-sharing and mutual support.
The question was never whether we in the Global South can “catch up” with the Global North’s AI dominance; it is whether we would use the technology as an equalizer to build a better world. LMICs have already started down this path, which suggests that the real AI revolution is to unfold in Accra, Sao Paulo, Nairobi and Jakarta, not in Silicon Valley. That is how it should be, because a data-rich, community-driven and inclusive AI ecosystem in the Global South benefits everyone.
Kate Kallot is the founder and CEO of Amini.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
RSS