The Executive Yuan announced a complete ban on the use of the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) app DeepSeek in the public sector, a move former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Policy Committee director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) criticized as being “foolish beyond description.”
As a result, the Ministry of Digital Affairs was smeared as the “Ministry of National Isolation.”
However, other nations have followed suit with similar bans — definitive proof that Taiwan made the correct decision.
South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo has reported that South Korea’s central and local governments, along with some companies, have also banned the use of DeepSeek. After the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of National Defense fired the first shots, other government agencies, including the Ministry of Unification, also issued clear orders prohibiting civil servants from using DeepSeek on government computers and mobile devices.
South Korean cities such as Seoul, Incheon and Daegu have taken similar measures, prompting some financial institutions and private enterprises to follow suit. The nation’s largest mobile chat app operator, Kakao Corp, was the first large technology company to respond.
The South Korean Ministry of Education also decided to ban DeepSeek, indicating that all affiliated agencies and schools should do the same. The ban applies to kindergartens, elementary schools, junior high schools and high schools. Institutions of higher education are permitted to use the app for academic research and educational purposes so long as cybersecurity precautions are taken.
That is very similar to Taiwan’s policy, where public universities and research institutions are allowed to use it only after gaining approval and taking necessary control measures.
The Australian government on Tuesday last week announced a comprehensive ban of DeepSeek from all government devices and systems. Australian Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke instructed all government departments to ensure that DeepSeek does not remain on any systems. The decision was made following an assessment by Australia’s intelligence agencies that concluded that it poses unacceptable risks, with users potentially facing malware attacks at any time.
Since the presidential transition, the US has yet to issue a comprehensive ban on DeepSeek, but the US Navy and NASA have already prohibited its use, with the US Navy issuing an e-mail stating that DeepSeek is not to be used “in any capacity” whether for work-related tasks or personal use. According to the memo, it is “imperative” that personnel “refrain from downloading, installing or using the DeepSeek model” to eliminate all possibility of potential personal data leakage and prevent it from falling into the control of state-owned telecoms connected to the Chinese military.
The latest development in the US is that a bipartisan pair of US representatives on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence introduced a “no DeepSeek on government devices” bill on Thursday last week. It would ban federal employees from using DeepSeek on government devices to prevent the Chinese government from using the platform to conduct surveillance and spread disinformation.
As for the more conservative and cautious Japanese government, aside from Japanese Minister for Digital Transformation Taira Masaaki’s reminder to public servants to avoid using DeepSeek until cybersecurity concerns are resolved, a warning was issued to all government departments. It emphasized the need to strictly adhere to the rule prohibiting the use of generative AI to handle sensitive information.
Taiwan is at the forefront of the threat from Chinese cyberattacks, and cybersecurity is national security. As such, allowing DeepSeek to infiltrate the nation that would be “foolish beyond description.” The DeepSeek ban was a correct proactive measure taken ahead of other nations.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS