The Executive Yuan announced a complete ban on the use of the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) app DeepSeek in the public sector, a move former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Policy Committee director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) criticized as being “foolish beyond description.”
As a result, the Ministry of Digital Affairs was smeared as the “Ministry of National Isolation.”
However, other nations have followed suit with similar bans — definitive proof that Taiwan made the correct decision.
South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo has reported that South Korea’s central and local governments, along with some companies, have also banned the use of DeepSeek. After the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of National Defense fired the first shots, other government agencies, including the Ministry of Unification, also issued clear orders prohibiting civil servants from using DeepSeek on government computers and mobile devices.
South Korean cities such as Seoul, Incheon and Daegu have taken similar measures, prompting some financial institutions and private enterprises to follow suit. The nation’s largest mobile chat app operator, Kakao Corp, was the first large technology company to respond.
The South Korean Ministry of Education also decided to ban DeepSeek, indicating that all affiliated agencies and schools should do the same. The ban applies to kindergartens, elementary schools, junior high schools and high schools. Institutions of higher education are permitted to use the app for academic research and educational purposes so long as cybersecurity precautions are taken.
That is very similar to Taiwan’s policy, where public universities and research institutions are allowed to use it only after gaining approval and taking necessary control measures.
The Australian government on Tuesday last week announced a comprehensive ban of DeepSeek from all government devices and systems. Australian Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke instructed all government departments to ensure that DeepSeek does not remain on any systems. The decision was made following an assessment by Australia’s intelligence agencies that concluded that it poses unacceptable risks, with users potentially facing malware attacks at any time.
Since the presidential transition, the US has yet to issue a comprehensive ban on DeepSeek, but the US Navy and NASA have already prohibited its use, with the US Navy issuing an e-mail stating that DeepSeek is not to be used “in any capacity” whether for work-related tasks or personal use. According to the memo, it is “imperative” that personnel “refrain from downloading, installing or using the DeepSeek model” to eliminate all possibility of potential personal data leakage and prevent it from falling into the control of state-owned telecoms connected to the Chinese military.
The latest development in the US is that a bipartisan pair of US representatives on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence introduced a “no DeepSeek on government devices” bill on Thursday last week. It would ban federal employees from using DeepSeek on government devices to prevent the Chinese government from using the platform to conduct surveillance and spread disinformation.
As for the more conservative and cautious Japanese government, aside from Japanese Minister for Digital Transformation Taira Masaaki’s reminder to public servants to avoid using DeepSeek until cybersecurity concerns are resolved, a warning was issued to all government departments. It emphasized the need to strictly adhere to the rule prohibiting the use of generative AI to handle sensitive information.
Taiwan is at the forefront of the threat from Chinese cyberattacks, and cybersecurity is national security. As such, allowing DeepSeek to infiltrate the nation that would be “foolish beyond description.” The DeepSeek ban was a correct proactive measure taken ahead of other nations.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS