The possibility of restarting cross-strait tourism for tour groups appears to not only be back on the table, but nearing dessert. President William Lai (賴清德) in his inaugural address emphasized tourism as an area where Taipei is keen to cooperate with Beijing, positing it as a cornerstone of his softer cross-strait policies. On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源) also said during the Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum in December last year that he would promote Taiwan as a travel destination for residents of his city — comments he would not have made without the go-ahead from his superiors.
Among all the anticipation, the Mainland Affairs Council has been steadfast in insisting that discussions proceed through the two organizations set up expressly to handle the matter: China’s Association for Tourism Exchange Across the Taiwan Straits and the Taiwan Strait Tourism Association of Taiwan. Coordination through these bodies is essential, as restarting tourism is not as simple as flipping a switch.
Cross-strait relations have changed since Beijing suspended tourism before the COVID-19 pandemic. Beijing has become more bellicose in its willingness to weaponize military maneuvers, economic sanctions and any other means to cow Taiwan for any perceived slight, including tourism. Even with extensive negotiations, Beijing would not hesitate to hoist tourism as a cudgel again. The best chance of softening its impact would be through careful planning.
The biggest concern is for the safety of Taiwanese visiting China, which has become more tenuous than in 2019. Beijing last year announced 22 guidelines to penalize “diehard Taiwanese independence separatists,” which include the death penalty. According to the National Security Bureau, more Taiwanese have been detained or faced trials in China since changes to its National Security Law made such interrogations easier. There is no guarantee that tourists would be safe.
Quality of tourism is also a major factor. Critics of the continued ban have decried its impact on the tourism sector, but allowing cross-strait tourism would not inevitably equate to increased revenue for travel-related businesses. It was not long ago that Chinese tour groups flooded the nation’s major travel destinations, bolstered by the China-centric tourism policies of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Most were organized by so-called “one-stop shop” tour agencies based in China, which negotiated for terrible deals with local vendors while keeping most of the revenue in China. The quality of some of the nation’s most popular destinations such as Sun Moon Lake and the National Palace Museum was eroded by their presence, curtailing the willingness of domestic or other international travelers to visit. Without another option, businesses had to accept the terrible deals offered by these agencies. Swinging the doors open wide once again to these agencies would risk eroding the gains seen in other markets in the past few years, all while failing to benefit local industry.
And gains have been made. Of the 10.69 million international visitors in 2016, 3.51 million — nearly one-third — were from China. Last year, there were a total of 7.85 million foreign visitors, admittedly shy of the 10 million target as post-pandemic travel continues to rebound, and the April earthquake and Chinese military drills kept travelers away. Yet as of November, only 377,499 were from China — only about 5 percent of the total at the time. Arrival goals might not have been reached yet, but the trend is clear and encouraging. Travelers from other countries also tend to spend more while here, proving that greater numbers do not always equal more economic opportunity.
Restarting tourism would be a welcome development for people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, but the administration is right to approach with caution for the sake of personal safety, national security and business interests.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS