Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too much video games and “toxic” fan culture. Such state-led social engineering shows that Beijing cannot tolerate the possibilities and optimism that are in the DNA of Western consumer societies. So it is in contradiction with itself by opposing and stimulating consumption at the same time.
China’s population structure has changed dramatically in the past five years, as it has been battling a declining birthrate and an aging population, which has weakened the labor force and increased production costs. That has also forced changes in the retirement system. Starting this year, the retirement age of 60 for men and 55 for women are to be gradually extended to 63 and 58 respectively.
At the opening of the 13th National Women’s Congress on Oct. 23, 2023, Xi told CCP officials that they have the responsibility to “strengthen young people’s concepts of marriage, childbirth and family,” so as to reshape Chinese women’s “new three concepts,” and “actively cultivate a new type of marriage and childbirth culture” in China.
For more than a year, CCP officials have worked hard to implement Xi’s instructions to save the country from the trends of intense birthrate decline and rapid societal aging. From 2022 to 2023, China’s total population decreased by 2.1 million people. Ever since then, various measures have been taken to push and persuade women to have children, with local governments making phone calls and home visits to inquire about women’s menstrual periods and childbirth plans, which have brought about numerous public complaints.
Today, the CCP is asking women to return to families and lose their sense of individuality, characterizing their main roles as wives and mothers. When the new generation of Chinese women heard Xi’s solution to the problem, they must have felt like it was some imperial edict from the Qing Dynasty.
It is hard to imagine how a leader who is so out of touch with the times can prescribe an effective remedy for the problem. With women’s self-awareness, the rising costs of raising children, involution, unfriendly workplaces and a pervasive traditional patriarchal culture, it is no wonder that almost every Chinese TV drama in recent years involves divorce scenarios. Relying on feudal viewpoints from the Qing Dynasty to solve gender issues in the era of artificial intelligence (AI) is like “climbing a tree to catch fish” (緣木求魚), as the old Chinese idiom goes.
China’s economy is also under tremendous pressure from the new policies of US President Donald Trump. As for Taiwan, the country should not underestimate itself. In addition to preserving its advantages in semiconductor technology, it should also carry out its industrial deployment and reduce its reliance on Chinese investment to open up a niche in the AI era.
Carol Lin is a professor at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University’s school of technology law.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength