Taiwan is bracing for enormous challenges this year to sustain strong economic growth amid potentially escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and uncertain prospects for the local artificial intelligence (AI) sector after China’s DeepSeek debuted its first chatbot, stirring turmoil in the industry. With a massive trade surplus with the US, Taiwan also faces high risks of sweeping heavy tariffs from Washington.
Foreign investors yesterday offloaded NT$74.39 billion (US$2.26 billion) of local stocks, one of the heaviest sell-offs in history. The TAIEX, a bellwether of Taiwan’s economy and highly sensitive to external environment changes, fell 3.53 percent to close at 22,694.71, with AI-related stocks bearing the brunt of the slump, the deepest in about a decade. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, which makes up 39 percent of the TAIEX, fell 5.73 percent to close at NT$1,070 in Taipei on concern that DeepSeek’s budget-friendly chatbot would challenge AI giants Nvidia Corp and OpenAI. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co and Quanta Computer Inc shares tumbled 8.06 percent and 9.83 percent respectively, as they are among major assemblers of AI servers based on Nvidia chips.
The shares of another Nvidia supplier, Wiwynn Corp, dropped 9.82 percent, as it was hit by escalating AI competition and heavy US tariffs. Mexico is a major server manufacturing hub of Wiwynn, shipping about 70 percent of its AI servers for North American customers from the country. A 25 percent tariff markup would increase manufacturing costs and squeeze profit margins. Wiwynn shares that pain with 300 other Taiwanese manufacturers with operations in Mexico.
To help companies cope with tariff hikes, the Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday announced it had set up a special task force to provide consultancy services about investment incentives in the US and to support production relocation and diversification efforts. The latter would be of little help, as changing manufacturing sites would take time and cautious evaluation, and corporate executives have a better understanding of the situation than government agencies.
Over the past few years, Taiwanese manufacturers have shifted manufacturing to Southeastern Asian countries or Mexico in response to intensifying geopolitical conflicts and US-China technology competition, aiming to enhance supply chain resilience. However, it is becoming more difficult to circumvent heavy US tariffs through another supply chain shift, as Vietnam and other Southeastern Asian countries are likely to also be trade targets of the US. Taiwan is at risk, as it is one of the 10 countries with the largest trade surplus with the US, topping US$42.2 billion in the first eight months of last year.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on Taiwan’s chips, but the impact should be manageable for chipmakers supplying advanced 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer chips, which are crucial for US companies seeking to beat Chinese rivals in AI and smartphones. However, Trump’s “softer on China, harder on others” approach would pose a challenge for local chipmakers offering less advanced chips. They are to face pricing competition from Chinese peers, given that Chinese goods face a mere 10 percent import levy.
To avoid punitive US tariffs, Taiwan needs to trim its massive trade surplus with the US. Appreciating the local currency is considered the most obvious approach, as other countries have done, but, a strong New Taiwan dollar would deal a blow to Taiwan’s already struggling traditional sector. Machine toolmakers, petrochemical suppliers and other companies in the traditional sector struggled to eke out a profit due to sagging demand on a weak world economy last year. Trump’s new trade vision is to have a deeper effect on Taiwan and requires wisdom from the government and industries to navigate the tariff storm.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS