US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with China.
Trump’s tariff orders were based on the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, which authorizes a US president to manage imports during a national emergency. His cited emergency is the flow of undocumented immigrants and fentanyl into the US. The orders indicate the beginning of potential trade disputes during his second term. Tariffs on the EU are also expected, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday.
In addition, the US would impose tariffs on computer chips, pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, copper and natural gas imports as soon as the middle of this month, he added, without citing specific countries. Clearly, macroeconomic factors would start to weigh on market sentiment and global trade as uncertainties increase even as Trump's tariffs on Canada and Mexico have been delayed for a month as leaders from both countries took steps to assuage the US president’s concerns.
During his first term, Trump had advisers who could help keep him in check, but his new administration is filled with loyalists. Take US secretary of commerce-designate Howard Lutnick, who would oversee tariff and trade policies. At a confirmation hearing on Wednesday last week before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Lutnick said he supported implementing across-the-board tariffs country by country to force trade partners to comply with Trump’s demand and the US’ interests.
Tariffs are one of the few policies Trump has consistently pushed through from his first term to the second term. On the campaign trail last year, he pledged to use tariffs to wield US leverage abroad. Most economists expect his tariff and immigration policies to be at least mildly inflationary, saying that they could stifle US economic growth. They would also trigger tit-for-tat retaliations and reduce global trade, but Trump said he was not concerned about the reaction of financial markets.
Trump has also ordered a review of policies regarding semiconductors, which might include measures against overseas chip production such as in Taiwan and subsidy agreements under the CHIPS and Science Act. Trump earlier suggested that high tariffs on overseas chipmakers could compel companies to build plants in the US.
“They left us, and they went to Taiwan... And we want them to come back, and we don’t want to give them billions of dollars,” he said on Monday last week.
Trump’s top focus in semiconductor policy is pressuring foreign chipmakers into making greater concessions and accelerating investment commitments in the US. Even though Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturing technology is crucial to helping realize his “America First” policy, any adjustments in US semiconductor policy are likely to affect Taiwan’s industry, information technology exports to the US and subsidies for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co to invest in the US.
As strong US allies such as Canada are subject to Trump’s first wave of tariffs, Taiwan should not think that it would be excluded. Trump would not only target semiconductors, but also other Taiwanese products. Therefore, the government must have communication channels in place to engage with the White House as soon as possible and reaffirm Taiwan’s commitment as a friend of the US. Taiwanese firms must also continue diversifying their markets and pursuing further supply chain reallocation, even shifting production to the US, in preparation for potential trade disputes and financial turmoil, while seizing opportunities as they arise.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press