The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party, holding a majority in the legislature, have continued to mess with our country’s Constitution and governance, pushing through huge budget cuts and bills that would undermine the country’s development.
The KMT caucus proposed slashing NT$77,000 (US$2,350) and freezing NT$70 million of the Ministry of Education’s Youth Development Administration’s budget. They said it was because Cosmopolitan Culture Action Taichung, a civic group subsidized by the youth agency, takes part in social movements.
This is no longer a legitimate act of oversight of the administration by the legislature. The opposition lawmakers are using the budget review as a tool to exercise political suppression, threatening Taiwan’s democracy and civil society.
The KMT caucus uses the right to review the budget as a tool of suppression, which goes against the principle of separation of powers. Under a democratic system, an administration, a legislature and a judiciary each performs its own function and has the power to check the other two, creating a balance between the three separate powers of the state.
However, the KMT interferes in the administration’s budget planning and execution by accusing the administration of subsidizing a civil organization that takes part in social movements. This is a breach of the separation of powers principle. The purpose of budget review is to ensure public funds are used appropriately, but not to be used as a means of political persecution.
What the KMT legislators are doing is undermining the development of civil society and freedom of speech. Civil groups’ participation in public affairs and their expression of opinion are the cornerstones of a democratic society.
The KMT is using the budget freeze as a means to suppress organizations that participate in public affairs. This does not only affect the operation of community organizations, but also threatens freedom of speech and assembly, creating a chilling effect in civil society.
Furthermore, the budget freeze they proposed is disproportionate. They proposed freezing NT$70 million of the budget just because the ministry gave a NT$77,000 subsidy to a civic group. This is against the principle of proportionality. This is simply a demonstration of a regression of democratic values and an authoritarian mentality.
Taiwan has gone through years of democratization progress. The flourishing development of civil society and the pluralistic expression of views indicate social progress.
The KMT’s manipulation of the budget review represents an erosion of the core values of democracy and a reflection that our country is still haunted by its authoritarian past.
This would not only impede civil groups’ operations, but would also discourage young people from taking part in public affairs, causing a long-term adverse impact on the development of democracy in Taiwan.
The legislature should exercise its right to review the government’s budget only to oversee the administration and to ensure proper use of public resources, but not to suppress dissent or silence civil society.
The KMT’s proposal to freeze the Youth Development Administration’s budget deviates from the spirit of democracy and should be strongly condemned.
I hope legislators from other political parties could safeguard democratic values, refuse to use budget review as a tool of political suppression, and protect pluralism and freedom in Taiwan’s civil society.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at the College of International Studies and Social Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Fion Khan
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS