It is everyone’s duty to protect the country. No one is an outsider. Of course, it is the same for political parties. People should make an effort to educate themselves. The government should also support and work with people to restore normalcy in the country. Our country is ours to save.
Our country is facing external threats. Chinese warplanes have made constant incursions around Taiwan. A Chinese-owned cargo vessel allegedly damaged an undersea cable near Taiwan’s northeastern coast earlier this month. In October last year, three Taiwanese members of the I-Kuan Tao (一貫道) religious group were arrested in China.
Our country has also been infiltrated from within. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers, acting as agents of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), are as ferocious as pit bull terriers. They use their legislative power to override the government.
They amended a law to allocate more funding for local governments rather than the central government, leaving the general budget in jeopardy. They passed a bill on pension reform for police to raise the maximum income replacement ratio. They proposed changes to the Chinese spouse law to reduce the period required to obtain Taiwanese citizenship. They raised the threshold to recall elected officials. They proposed budget cuts for national defense. There are countless examples of their attempts to destroy our country.
People have come forward — 3,000 teachers, indigenous youth in Hualien County and the younger generation who grew up in the military dependents’ villages in Taichung. Numerous Taiwanese are furious. Their passion has been ignited.
We, as masters of the country, must exercise our right to recall. Recalling KMT legislators is necessary to prevent Taiwan from being annihilated by the CCP. It is the only way to protect our country. The ruling Democratic Progressive Party is duty-bound to spare no effort to support the mass recall movement.
Recalling KMT legislators has become a national movement. A single spark can start a prairie fire. KMT and TPP lawmakers are plunging the country into chaos by pushing through draconian laws in the legislature. Their vicious acts would only encourage the public to take part in the recall petition.
Residents of Hualien County residents are not afraid of KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), a longtime “King of Hualien.” Other cities and counties would only see more seething discontent.
The DPP government should support civic groups that organize the recall movement by allowing civil servants to provide assistance at mobile stations and service centers to help people sign recall petitions.
My patriotic friends and I cannot join the petition, as we do not have KMT legislators in our electoral districts. Neither do residents in Chiayi, Tainan, Kaohsiung and Pingtung. This does not make us love Taiwan less than anyone else. We willcontribute our money and labor to supporting the mobile stations, thereby transforming this mass recall movement into something historic and to be proud of within Taiwan’s democratic movement.
Lin Chin-kuo is a business manager at a technology company.
Translated by Fion Khan
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS