Today marks the 70th anniversary of the battle at Yijiangshan Island (一江山). The battle began on Jan. 18, 1955, when the Chinese People’s Liberation Army launched a large-scale invasion of Yijiangshan — north of Dachen Island (大陳島) — which was then under the control of the Republic of China (ROC). ROC Commander Wang Sheng-ming (王生明) courageously led his troops into battle.
“Our banners darken the sky; the enemy teem like clouds. Through the hail of arrows the warriors press forward,” the poem the Hymn of the Fallen says.
ROC troops were vastly outnumbered and most fell heroically in service of the country — Wang included. In the February following Yijiangshan’s loss, the government evacuated all troops and civilians on Dachen Island to Taiwan with the US’ protection. Today, Taipei City has sites such as Yijiang Street, Yijiang Park and a memorial for the soldiers who died in the battle.
China currently continues to intimidate and threaten Taiwan with military harassment, espionage and infiltration. Thus, we must support the military in countering the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and protect Taiwan. Taiwanese must have confidence in our military — we should not listen to pro-CCP political parties and politicians who undermine it.
Look at the war in Ukraine. Russia ranks second in global military strength — far surpassing that of Ukraine — and it does not need to cross the ocean for battle. Yet, after three years, Russia still has not conquered Ukraine. North Korea even dispatched about 10,000 troops to assist Russia, a measure that proved useless and only resulted in more casualties.
One could also look to the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War. China did not need to cross the ocean to attack Vietnam, yet in the end it went home with its tail between its legs.
The best method to commemorate the troops who were martyred at Yijiangshan — to ensure their blood was not shed in vain — is to firmly uphold our democratic front line and strengthen combat readiness to guarantee China could never annex Taiwan. All Taiwanese must strongly support the military. During elections, we must not vote for pro-CCP political parties that attempt to undermine the military and damage its morale.
Which political party’s legislators are blocking the budget for Taiwan’s indigenous submarine program? Which party’s retired generals visited China to listen to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech?
China’s aggressive expansionist ambitions are the root cause of the crisis in the Taiwan Strait. Just as a thug needs no special reason to assault someone, the CCP needs no special reason to kill. It is certainly not as simple as those pro-CCP parties make it out to be, with their misguided claims that there would be no war so long as Taiwan “behaves” and avoids “provoking” China.
Did the residents of Yijiangshan or Kinmen try to declare independence? Not once. Yet the CCP still attacked them.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) once said he would do his utmost to prevent a war from breaking out in the strait during his lifetime. That might sound touching at first, but please note, he certainly did not say he would do his utmost to “prevent the CCP from annexing Taiwan.” Does that not imply that in the event of a Chinese invasion he would push for surrender? Last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) even said: “If we affirm that the People’s Republic of China’s territorial scope includes Taiwan, then what would be wrong with them recovering Taiwan?”
Are people such as these worthy of the sacrifices made by the martyrs at Yijiangshan?
Yang Hau-min is a government employee.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS