US president-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday said that he would not rule out military force to “take back” the Panama Canal or to take over Greenland, adding that sovereign control over those two areas is of the utmost importance to US national security.
Trump has made such statements before. He openly expressed his interest in Greenland and Panama on several occasions during his first term.
Simply put, Greenland’s strategic value to the US can be found in laying along the shortest flight paths between Europe and North America, and being the absolute best location for the US military’s deployment of ballistic missile early warning and interception systems — some of which are already deployed there. The importance of the Panama Canal is far more evident, including for naval vessels. Every day, several US Navy vessels rely on the canal to cut down on time traversing between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
As for Taiwan’s location, it possesses advantages similar to Greenland and the Panama Canal. With the Leshan radar station, we can see the airspace situation stretching from the Korean Peninsula in the north, down to the furthest islands of the South China Sea, as well as deep into inland China.
Such information is extremely important for the US’ operations of intercontinental ballistic early warning systems and interception missions in the Indo-Pacific region.
Moreover, a report by the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies in October showed that, based on trade data, about one-fifth of the world’s trade passed through the Taiwan Strait. In other words, were the Strait to come under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) control, it would be tantamount to putting a chokehold on large trading powers, such as the US and Japan.
When comparing Greenland and the Panama Canal with Taiwan, it goes without saying that if Trump is insistent on his ideas for the former, then he simply cannot sit back and watch the CCP take control of Taiwan.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in Massachusetts.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS