South Korea’s prolonged political crisis appears to have no end in sight. It is just over a month since South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared, then lifted, martial law. Since then, the domestic and regional challenges have been multiplying. To manage the chaos, citizens need to set aside their differences and find a way out of the impasse. That would not be easy.
Animosity between factions runs deep. Attempts to arrest Yoon, who was impeached on Dec. 14, have so far ended in vain. His supporters have marched in the streets, calling for authorities to “Stop the Steal” — a reference to the chant that US president-elect Donald Trump’s camp echoed against US President Joe Biden in the 2020 election, alleging his victory was rigged.
Yoon has remained frustratingly defiant. He is also under criminal investigation for insurrection, but has vowed to “fight until the end,” hiding out in his Seoul home protected by a blockade of buses, barbed wire, crowds of supporters and his own armed security guards. It is unclear whether authorities would be able to arrest him without risking a violent confrontation.
His fate has become a lightning rod for South Korea’s growing political divisions. The gap between loyalists and those who want him out is widening, a worrying development in a relatively young democracy. In an echo of the US election denialism four years ago, a Hankook Research poll showed that 65 percent of Yoon’s conservative People Power Party members believe April last year’s parliamentary polls — in which his party suffered a massive loss — were fraudulent. In comparison, only 29 percent of the public believe this.
The longer this fiasco drags on, the more difficult it would be for the current government to address the nation’s most pressing problems. At home, it must deal with a weak economy and struggling currency, which fell 10 percent last quarter versus the US dollar. In a reminder of the threat North Korea poses, this week Kim Jong-un’s regime fired the first missile of the year toward the Sea of Japan. Pyongyang’s closer collaboration with Moscow means that the North could have access to new technology to help it further its nuclear weapons program.
The threat is now so acute that many increasingly support nuclearization, Robert Kelly of Pusan National University and Kim Min-hyung of Kyung Hee University wrote in Foreign Affairs. According to a 2022 poll, 71 percent of South Koreans favor such a move. These sorts of conversations should be the focus of South Korean political life, rather than the domestic crisis playing out today on the streets.
Seoul also has to navigate its ties with Washington. The missile test took place while US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was in the capital, talking up the alliance. However, this relationship is only as good as the individuals maintaining it. Yoon shared a good rapport with Biden, and together with then-Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida, they helped to create a partnership to act as a bulwark against China’s rising influence.
There is no guarantee that Trump would follow Biden’s lead. In a speech on Tuesday, Trump spoke of ambitions to use “economic force” to compel Canada to become the 51st state in the US and suggested calling the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.” There was no mention of his plans for Asia, but Trump is likely to usher in an unpredictable era that could include getting partners like Seoul to pay for their own defense. None of this is encouraging for South Korea’s new leader, whoever that eventually is.
Against the backdrop of a complicated geopolitical environment, citizens must put their country first and change their political culture, as Shin Gi-wook, director of the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University, wrote about politics in South Korea, where several presidents have ended up in disgrace or jailed.
“Demonizing opponents, divisive identity politics, and insular political fandoms and populism have no place in a healthy democracy,” he wrote.
The alternative is further instability. Even if it is not the Trump administration’s first priority, South Korea needs the US on its side. There are approximately 28,500 US troops in the country, helping to provide a much needed security buffer against the North. Any drawdown in numbers would leave vulnerable the same political parties and citizens who are putting short-term interests before national ones.
This ongoing constitutional crisis cannot go on indefinitely. Yoon and his supporters should allow the legal process to play out unimpeded. His opponents, in return, could consider toning down their rhetoric in parliament — their goals would not be met through a protracted gridlock.
A democracy is only as good as the respect afforded to its institutions, and the value voters give it. Compromise and unity is what is needed now, not division and strife. Otherwise, South Koreans face a future where their country is likely to be paralyzed for months, possibly years. It is they who would suffer the most.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS