Politics in Taiwan and South Korea have descended into chaos, resulting in tense standoffs, with one shared cause being the legislative majority wielded by the opposition parties in both countries.
Suspended South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was impeached by opposition lawmakers for attempting to implement martial law.
President William Lai (賴清德) has shown he is unwilling to break laws or contravene the Constitution, despite the disregard of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) for the document. Lai is showing a lot of tolerance for the opposition parties and expressed in his New Year’s speech a willingness to use “greater democracy” to resolve issues.
What did he mean by that? The only feasible recourse for voters is recalls and elections.
Last year, after the legislature passed three proposals in a power grab aimed at impeding the proper implementation of the Constitution and judicial system, civil society rose up, launching “mass recall” demonstrations and recall petition signature drives in an attempt to remove 27 KMT legislators. On Feb. 1, those legislators are to face formal recalls.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) holds 51 seats in the legislature, while the KMT has 52, plus two KMT-aligned independents. The TPP has eight legislators-at-large, who cannot be recalled.
If the KMT loses three seats, the dynamic in the legislature could shift significantly.
TPP Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) essentially follows everything that KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) proposes, so the KMT-TPP opposition can be expected to continue meddling in Taiwan’s laws and institutions.
Overturning three KMT-held seats might not be enough: At least 11 KMT legislators would need to be recalled.
Mass recalls differ from individual recalls in that they seek to alter the wider political dynamic. In a sense, it matters little which lawmakers are targeted, as the entire KMT caucus acts en masse, toeing the party line. Fu is widely seen as the legislature’s most pro-Chinese Communist Party member and is considered to be carrying out the orders of Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) and perhaps even Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The rest of the KMT simply follows suit.
Considering the electoral base Fu and his wife have built in Hualien County, it would be difficult to recall him directly. That is why civic groups have repeatedly said that recalling any KMT legislator would essentially be as good as recalling Fu himself.
The DPP has proposed recalling Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), while DPP legislative caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) has urged the recall of 39 KMT legislators and the two KMT-affiliated lawmakers. It seems the situation is coming to a head, which is a good thing.
In a democratic system, voters must have the right of recall. Under the chorus of voices calling for it, some KMT politicians seem to be showing restraint, but the TPP legislators continue to act arrogantly, crying foul about their former chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), being detained over his alleged involvement in financial scandals. They also continue to make unfounded claims that prosecutors are colluding with the central government in charging Ko and have been demonstrating in support of him.
They know they can behave like this, as they are not vulnerable to recall as legislators-at-large. Voters can still teach them a lesson by recalling their KMT taskmasters.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS