The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has expended considerable resources to source Taiwanese online influencers willing to collaborate on “united front” propaganda videos and other pro-China multimedia projects, with the intent of influencing Taiwanese and politics.
Beijing must be wondering if it needed to go through all that effort after hearing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Weng Hsiao-ling’s (翁曉玲) statements at the legislature to Presidential Office Secretary-General Pan Men-an (潘孟安).
Why cultivate pro-CCP online influencers when there are already people in positions of power such as Weng doing Beijing’s bidding? Her spouting CCP talking points in the legislature would pay the CCP far more dividends than having to resort to online influencers.
That said, when it is time to go to the polls for next year’s local elections, the Democratic Progressive Party would only need to replay video clips of Weng making her pro-China speeches. The KMT might as well pack its bags and go home.
“If we affirm that the People’s Republic of China [PRC, China] territorial scope includes Taiwan, then what would be wrong about them recovering Taiwan?” Weng asked.
For a legislator-at-large serving in the legislature of the Republic of China to speak such nonsense after taking an oath to uphold and abide by the Constitution, how could she suddenly start repeating political stances held by a hostile state and then ask “what would be wrong” about Taiwan being “recovered” by China?
Such rhetoric and positioning borders on treason. The majority of Taiwanese cannot accept her words, let alone Pan.
The “recovery” being referred to is the belief that Taiwan is a “lost Chinese territory” that the CCP intends to “recover,” yet Taiwan has never been a part of China. It was never “lost” to begin with, so why would it ever need to be “recovered”?
The KMT’s past era of party-state rule emphasized opposing the CCP and recovering the “mainland,” couched in terms of an irrational “restoration” that realistically could never be achieved, as the KMT was defeated in China and exiled to Taiwan. They vowed to counterattack and recover the national territory “occupied” by the CCP. That was considered a dyed-in-the-wool position that could see someone labeled a traitor to Taiwan if they did not support it.
KMT political figures have long claimed in their own party charter that both sides of the Taiwan Strait would be unified. As for how they intend to forcibly marry off Taiwan to China, they want to remain in a twilight zone, adhering to the so-called “1992 consensus,” in which both sides “acknowledge there is one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
If Wang advocating the selling out of Taiwan were broadcast on the global stage, how would the US not reconsider whether to step in if the nation was claimed to be part of China and the “original” overlord wanted to “recover” it? Why would other countries bother sticking up for us?
With opposition lawmakers voicing such sentiments, our military, who have pledged to protect our national territory, could waver and capitulate to CCP-peddled defeatism. That would seriously impact our national security.
The government needs to swiftly and resoundingly refute such nonsense. The KMT has yet to distance itself from Weng’s absurdities. Does this mean they agree with or implicitly endorse what she is saying?
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS