The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has expended considerable resources to source Taiwanese online influencers willing to collaborate on “united front” propaganda videos and other pro-China multimedia projects, with the intent of influencing Taiwanese and politics.
Beijing must be wondering if it needed to go through all that effort after hearing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Weng Hsiao-ling’s (翁曉玲) statements at the legislature to Presidential Office Secretary-General Pan Men-an (潘孟安).
Why cultivate pro-CCP online influencers when there are already people in positions of power such as Weng doing Beijing’s bidding? Her spouting CCP talking points in the legislature would pay the CCP far more dividends than having to resort to online influencers.
That said, when it is time to go to the polls for next year’s local elections, the Democratic Progressive Party would only need to replay video clips of Weng making her pro-China speeches. The KMT might as well pack its bags and go home.
“If we affirm that the People’s Republic of China [PRC, China] territorial scope includes Taiwan, then what would be wrong about them recovering Taiwan?” Weng asked.
For a legislator-at-large serving in the legislature of the Republic of China to speak such nonsense after taking an oath to uphold and abide by the Constitution, how could she suddenly start repeating political stances held by a hostile state and then ask “what would be wrong” about Taiwan being “recovered” by China?
Such rhetoric and positioning borders on treason. The majority of Taiwanese cannot accept her words, let alone Pan.
The “recovery” being referred to is the belief that Taiwan is a “lost Chinese territory” that the CCP intends to “recover,” yet Taiwan has never been a part of China. It was never “lost” to begin with, so why would it ever need to be “recovered”?
The KMT’s past era of party-state rule emphasized opposing the CCP and recovering the “mainland,” couched in terms of an irrational “restoration” that realistically could never be achieved, as the KMT was defeated in China and exiled to Taiwan. They vowed to counterattack and recover the national territory “occupied” by the CCP. That was considered a dyed-in-the-wool position that could see someone labeled a traitor to Taiwan if they did not support it.
KMT political figures have long claimed in their own party charter that both sides of the Taiwan Strait would be unified. As for how they intend to forcibly marry off Taiwan to China, they want to remain in a twilight zone, adhering to the so-called “1992 consensus,” in which both sides “acknowledge there is one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
If Wang advocating the selling out of Taiwan were broadcast on the global stage, how would the US not reconsider whether to step in if the nation was claimed to be part of China and the “original” overlord wanted to “recover” it? Why would other countries bother sticking up for us?
With opposition lawmakers voicing such sentiments, our military, who have pledged to protect our national territory, could waver and capitulate to CCP-peddled defeatism. That would seriously impact our national security.
The government needs to swiftly and resoundingly refute such nonsense. The KMT has yet to distance itself from Weng’s absurdities. Does this mean they agree with or implicitly endorse what she is saying?
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Tim Smith
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS