Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙) was accused of giving illegal favors — such as exempting some property and construction firms from land taxes — in exchange for use of land to conduct activities linked to the 2020 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential and legislative election campaigns.
She also allegedly exempted some properties from building code contraventions that would have required the demolition of illegal structures. She was charged with corruption and — after a trial at the Yilan District Court — found guilty and sentenced to 12 years and six months along with a six-year deprivation of her civil rights.
Lin was suspended from her post in accordance with the Local Government Act (地方制度法), making her the second head of a local government to be suspended following Hsinchu Mayor Anne Kao (高虹安) last year.
The nature of Lin’s crimes and sentencing is particularly unfortunate considering Yilan’s legacy as a beacon of democracy and “clean governance,” championed by former county commissioner and minister of justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南).
The judge determined that Lin failed to fulfill her duties as an elected local leader and — based on personal relationships — directed her subordinates to undermine the impartiality of civil servants when performing their duties, eroding the credibility of elected officials. As a result, her sentence was lengthened in accordance with the law.
Lin said she was the victim of political persecution and said that the judicial system had been hijacked.
However, Lin has yet to explain the nearly NT$80 million (US$2.43 million) in unexplained funds in an account in her name. How can she expect to earn the trust of Yilan County residents?
KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), who intends to run for Yilan County Commissioner next year, said that the Ministry of the Interior’s decision to suspend Lin based on a first-trial conviction over unexplained income was political manipulation.
Unexplained income is not on the same level as benefiting from corruption, for which suspension is only mandated after a second-trial conviction, Wu said.
If they had to wait until the second trial to suspend her on the more severe crime of corruption, why can she be suspended upon a first-instance conviction for unexplained income? he asked.
The seeming disparity is because an elected official possessing an “unaccounted-for increase of property or income” was not declared a crime under the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) until 2009, while the Local Government Act — which calls for the suspension of local government heads who have contravened the Anti-Corruption Act — was established in 1999, a decade before the addition of the unexplained increases in property or income clauses were added.
So the seemingly unusual situation of Lin being suspended for a conviction for a lesser crime when she would not have been for a more serious conviction is in accordance with the law. It was not a partisan decision, nor was it political manipulation.
Lin sacrificed Yilan’s longstanding values of integrity and clean governance — the pride of the county’s residents — in exchange for her own interests. She also impaired the operational effectiveness of the Yilan County Government, casting a shadow of corruption over the county.
Lin has shattered the system by being Yilan County’s first commissioner to be suspended for corruption. She should admit wrongdoing, acknowledge her suspension and apologize to Yilan’s residents.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS