Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) resigned as TPP chairman yesterday afternoon after meeting with party members. TPP legislative caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) was selected to serve as acting chairman in a virtually unanimous show of hands: Huang was the only person present who did not raise their hand in support of his own selection.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, TPP Taichung chapter head Chiang Ho-shu (江和樹) said that Ko would remain a permanent member of the party, and that his spirit would “forever be there.” He also wanted to remind the party faithful that Ko was forced to stand down because of the allegations of corruption against him, and that he was only doing so because of his love for the party.
Somebody during the meeting had suggested that Ko could remain as an honorary chairman, although Ko himself rejected this idea, Chiang said.
Ko is not only the founder and former chairman of the TPP, he is its spiritual leader. He is facing serious allegations of corruption and breach of trust, for which prosecutors are seeking a prison sentence of more than 28 years and a NT$50 million (US$1.53 million) fine. He was only able to attend yesterday’s emergency meeting in person because he has been allowed out on bail — against prosecutors’ wishes and following rulings by three separate courts — with bail set at a unprecedented NT$70 million and after spending 114 days in a detention center.
It is only right that Ko resign as party chairman, given the allegations against him. Any politician would make this choice. In normal circumstances, the party would demand that a leader under a cloud of suspicion do so for the good of the party. It is not an admission of guilt, it is what is required to remove any distractions to the party’s operations and limit further damage to its image.
However, the TPP is no ordinary party. Even before last year’s presidential election and since its founding in August 2019, it has been regarded as a one-man party, so inextricably linked to its founder that commentators have wondered what it could possibly do without him, asking whether it mattered who its individual legislators were, and even comparing it to a religious cult, with Ko at the head.
One need look no further than what happened at yesterday’s emergency meeting and at Chiang’s comments to the media: The reluctance to allow him to fully resign, the talk of his spirit being forever present, the reminder of the ultimate sacrifice done only out of his love for his disciples. Since the initial indictment against him, Huang has led Ko’s supporters in accusing the government, President William Lai (賴清德) and the judiciary of waging political persecution against their leader. Think Pontius Pilate and Jesus Christ.
This is, indeed, the language of the pious and of religious fervor.
Ko had been granted permission to submit a resignation during his time kept incommunicado in the detention center, but at the time TPP Central Committee member Lin Fu-nan (林富男) had suggested that the central committee would not accept it. With Ko meeting them in person, they have accepted it, however reluctantly.
The question now is, how would the TPP survive without him? More to the point, would his resignation make any difference? Would he still call the shots from the background? Would the party faithful kneel before him and seek spiritual guidance?
Huang is the natural choice to succeed Ko. He has essentially acted as his second-in-command in the legislature, even before the indictment and the detention. Why is he so reluctant to take on the mantle of chairman? What is behind the decision for him to only be acting chairman?
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences