Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) resigned as TPP chairman yesterday afternoon after meeting with party members. TPP legislative caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) was selected to serve as acting chairman in a virtually unanimous show of hands: Huang was the only person present who did not raise their hand in support of his own selection.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, TPP Taichung chapter head Chiang Ho-shu (江和樹) said that Ko would remain a permanent member of the party, and that his spirit would “forever be there.” He also wanted to remind the party faithful that Ko was forced to stand down because of the allegations of corruption against him, and that he was only doing so because of his love for the party.
Somebody during the meeting had suggested that Ko could remain as an honorary chairman, although Ko himself rejected this idea, Chiang said.
Ko is not only the founder and former chairman of the TPP, he is its spiritual leader. He is facing serious allegations of corruption and breach of trust, for which prosecutors are seeking a prison sentence of more than 28 years and a NT$50 million (US$1.53 million) fine. He was only able to attend yesterday’s emergency meeting in person because he has been allowed out on bail — against prosecutors’ wishes and following rulings by three separate courts — with bail set at a unprecedented NT$70 million and after spending 114 days in a detention center.
It is only right that Ko resign as party chairman, given the allegations against him. Any politician would make this choice. In normal circumstances, the party would demand that a leader under a cloud of suspicion do so for the good of the party. It is not an admission of guilt, it is what is required to remove any distractions to the party’s operations and limit further damage to its image.
However, the TPP is no ordinary party. Even before last year’s presidential election and since its founding in August 2019, it has been regarded as a one-man party, so inextricably linked to its founder that commentators have wondered what it could possibly do without him, asking whether it mattered who its individual legislators were, and even comparing it to a religious cult, with Ko at the head.
One need look no further than what happened at yesterday’s emergency meeting and at Chiang’s comments to the media: The reluctance to allow him to fully resign, the talk of his spirit being forever present, the reminder of the ultimate sacrifice done only out of his love for his disciples. Since the initial indictment against him, Huang has led Ko’s supporters in accusing the government, President William Lai (賴清德) and the judiciary of waging political persecution against their leader. Think Pontius Pilate and Jesus Christ.
This is, indeed, the language of the pious and of religious fervor.
Ko had been granted permission to submit a resignation during his time kept incommunicado in the detention center, but at the time TPP Central Committee member Lin Fu-nan (林富男) had suggested that the central committee would not accept it. With Ko meeting them in person, they have accepted it, however reluctantly.
The question now is, how would the TPP survive without him? More to the point, would his resignation make any difference? Would he still call the shots from the background? Would the party faithful kneel before him and seek spiritual guidance?
Huang is the natural choice to succeed Ko. He has essentially acted as his second-in-command in the legislature, even before the indictment and the detention. Why is he so reluctant to take on the mantle of chairman? What is behind the decision for him to only be acting chairman?
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
RSS