China’s military activity over the past year suggests it is planning for the annexation of Taiwan, the US Department of Defense wrote in an annual report published on Wednesday.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has a number of options to coerce Taiwan and while an amphibious invasion would “likely strain [the PLA] and invite a strong international response,” it had conducted “realistic, large-scale” amphibious assault training last year that was “almost certainly aimed at supporting a Taiwan invasion scenario,” it said.
China has been increasing missile systems along its coast facing Taiwan and moving land-based aircraft to its air force, it said, adding that Taiwan is responding by growing its defense industrial base and improving the joint operations of its forces.
In an article published by Foreign Affairs on Oct. 5, 2021, then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that Taiwan does not seek military confrontation, but would do whatever it takes to defend its democracy and way of life. As the old adage says, the best defense is a strong offense. In the past, the idea that Taiwan could target China’s Three Gorges Dam as a deterrent to a PLA attack was touted by US defense officials, and while Taipei could strike the dam with newer long-range missiles such as the Ching Tien (擎天), doing so might still not be in its best interest.
Striking the dam would not impact China’s ability to conduct warfare and given China’s record of human rights abuses against its own people, it is unlikely to be deterred by the threat of a massive death toll from a flood. Such an attack on noncombatants would also likely cause a loss of international support for Taiwan at a time when it would need assistance the most.
However, that does not mean Taiwan should abandon the idea of targeting locations in China as a potential deterrent. Taiwan could aim its missile systems at China’s large coal-fired and thermal power plants, its railway networks (particularly those that could be used to transport wartime supplies), its airports and seaports, and so on.
Taiwan has been investing heavily in its defense industry in recent years, developing new missile systems, and building submarines and high-speed corvettes for the navy. Long-range missiles could potentially be launched from those submarines and corvettes while they operate in the Taiwan Strait, as such launchers would be harder for the PLA to target.
The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology on Tuesday said that it received an order from the navy for a domestically developed suicide drone. Such drones could be deployed and launched from fast boats or from the deck of a briefly surfaced submarine near China’s coast, sending them toward targets in Guangdong, Fujian or Zhejiang provinces.
Suicide drones are slower and carry a smaller payload, but they can loiter and be harder to detect. The small size and slow speed of a drone mean that cameras might confuse them for birds. They can also be made of radar-absorbing carbon, operating quietly using electric motors and flying close to the ground under the cover of night, making them hard to detect. Drones can incorporate autonomous systems that would allow them to continue toward their target when the enemy uses a signal jammer, and captured drones could be designed to self-destruct.
Defending Taiwan would become increasingly difficult as China strengthens its military and grows more emboldened. The nation must ensure that annexation would be very costly for Beijing by developing the capability to conduct unbridled destructive attacks on China’s key infrastructure and demonstrate the resolve to engage in such attacks.
By increasing drone and missile production and deployment, strengthening cyberwarfare capabilities, increasing its resilience through the stockpiling of resources and fortifying links with global communications networks, Taiwan can show China that an attempted invasion would be fruitless and costly.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at