Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — who once endured the hardship of living under an authoritarian political system and arduously led a quiet revolution — once said: “Democratic issues must be solved with democratic means.” Today, as Taiwanese are faced with the malicious subversion of our country’s democratic constitutional order, we must not panic. Rather, we should start by taking democratic action to rescue the Constitutional Court.
As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) leads the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in strangling Taiwan’s judiciary and depriving individuals of the right to recall and development, Taiwanese are filled with anxiety. In response, various countermeasures have been proposed — the Executive Yuan could refuse to countersign, President William Lai (賴清德) could refuse to promulgate the law, a constitutional interpretation could be conducted but not a review, Lai could personally step in to negotiate internal disputes or a mass recall movement could be initiated.
Lai declared at the first opportunity that, to uphold the constitutional order, he would use democratic means to address recent legislative actions that deviate from democratic principles. Therefore, tactics like refusing to countersign and refusing to promulgate or review the law contravene the constitutional order and are unacceptable.
So, what democratic means would safeguard Taiwan’s democratic constitutional order?
On Tuesday, as if acting as a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) agent, Fu led KMT and TPP legislators in blocking all seven of Lai’s judicial nominees. Under their malicious reforms, the Constitutional Court would be left in a dysfunctional state. This not only revealed their intent to strangle the very core of Taiwan’s democratic constitutional order, but — even more frighteningly — resembled a legal “democratic coup.”
As Taiwanese face this “democratic coup,” we must abide by the democratic constitutional order to strengthen our democratic immunity.
We must support the DPP’s legislative caucus and the Judicial Yuan — the opposing party in the disputes caused by the KMT and TPP’s malicious amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法). In accordance with the rights protected under the constitution — separation of powers and judicial independence — both should immediately file suits for a constitutional review and temporary relief.
As Fu and other KMT and TPP members’ self-serving legislation contravenes the principles of democratic electoral agreements and the people’s right to recall, the Executive Yuan should respond with proper constitutional procedures. After Lai promulgates the law, it should file for reconsideration, a constitutional review and temporary relief.
With regard to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), Fu and other KMT and TPP members are fabricating fiscal disputes between the central and local governments to destabilize Taiwan’s governance and create political division. This would lead to the disproportionate allocation of resources to city and county governments.
To handle this crisis — and before launching a mass recall movement — Taiwanese must unite and combine our efforts to save the Constitutional Court. This is the foundation for safeguarding Taiwan’s democratic constitutional order.
Chen Tsai-neng is a doctoral candidate at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of International Politics.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS