TikTok a national security risk
A deepfake video of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) recently spread on TikTok and Line in Taiwan. Ker filed a complaint with the authorities and urged the public not to share the video.
TikTok is a tool for cognitive warfare by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and it has escalated its efforts. While the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) camps in the legislature passed three controversial bills, Ker held a news conference criticizing the KMT and TPP for endangering the nation and disrupting governance.
Meanwhile, a video with simplified Chinese subtitles, a Chinese-accented voiceover and content slandering the ruling DPP appeared on TikTok. Although those with discerning eyes could immediately recognize it as a fake, its provocative nature, rapid release and intent to mislead are alarming.
Taiwan should take the influence of TikTok seriously and observe how other countries regulate the platform. The US and EU have banned the use of TikTok on government devices due to concerns user data collected by the platform could be transmitted to the Chinese government, posing a threat to national security. The UK found that TikTok breached data privacy laws and might have improperly used data from young users. For security reasons, it has also banned TikTok on government devices. India banned TikTok due to its content inciting social unrest, promoting violence and negatively affecting mental health. Albania announced a one-year ban on TikTok that started on Saturday, citing concerns over the harmful effects of violent videos on teenagers.
The main argument against a ban is that it could harm freedom of speech in democratic countries. However, the CCP is exploiting the shield of free speech to undermine democracies. Taiwan should prioritize national security over freedom of speech, as freedom cannot exist without a secure nation.
Moreover, freedom of speech does not equate to unrestricted use of technology. Allowing TikTok to freely exploit user data in Taiwan creates significant vulnerabilities in national security and individual privacy.
Social media is not limited to TikTok — Taiwan offers a diverse range of alternatives, such as Instagram, Threads and YouTube. The reasons to ban TikTok go beyond its role as a tool for CCP political warfare. Its negative impact on mental health and the spread of misinformation undermine Taiwan’s stability and serve as evidence for international restrictions on TikTok. Taiwan must take decisive action to incorporate a TikTok ban into its long-term strategy for sustainable security.
Chan Jen-hsin
Taoyuan
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS