Gisele Pelicot, a 72-year-old woman who had retired to a small village in provincial France, has become a heroine not only to compatriots, but to people thousands of miles away, rightly saluted by global leaders and ordinary citizens alike. In refusing anonymity and insisting that the trial of her ex-husband and other men for raping her be held in public, she has forced a broader recognition that “shame must change sides.” Her extraordinary courage and composure shone through the grim hearings.
For almost 10 years, Gisele Pelicot’s husband of decades drugged and raped her, and sedated her so that dozens of others could rape her at his instigation.
Dominique Pelicot was caught by chance after a security guard caught him filming up women’s skirts at a supermarket, prompting police to seize his computer equipment. However, he has since admitted an attempted rape in 1999, after police matched his DNA to a sample from the scene, and is under investigation for a 1991 rape and murder that has similarities with that incident. He denies involvement.
Yet while Dominique Pelicot is one of France’s most serious sexual offenders, he is in one sense typical: Most offenders are known to their victims and many are their partners. The scale of the trial also made it clear that sexual predators are not rare or anomalous. Fifty more men stood trial and were found guilty; about 20 more have not been traced. Those were ordinary men of all ages and backgrounds, including a nurse, a journalist, a fire officer and truck drivers. Several experienced childhood sexual abuse, but others described idyllic upbringings.
In the words of the Pelicots’ former daughter-in-law, abuse is a “banality,” because “abuse is everywhere.”
The case raises hard questions about France’s culture and its legal system. The necessity of consent is not inscribed within the law. Yet women around the world could easily envision that apparently unimaginable crime happening in their countries, their neighborhoods — perhaps even their homes.
Although Gisele Pelicot has reminded women that the shame lies with their attacker, not with them, her abusers have yet to absorb that lesson. She appeared surely irreproachable to even unreconstructed observers: a married pensioner who had been attacked while unconscious and whose husband admitted to orchestrating the rapes, with men he often met in a chatroom entitled “without her knowledge,” in crimes captured in graphic videos.
And yet most of her attackers denied rape and their lawyers asked her whether she was a swinger, exhibitionist or alcoholic; why she was not angrier with her husband; why she did not cry more in court.
One perpetrator said that he “had not paid attention” to whether she had consented; another that “the husband had given me permission.” The wife of one suggested that “because I refused him [sex] all the time, as a man, he had to look elsewhere.”
In other words, although the reckoning Gisele Pelicot has forced is remarkable, it is only partial. Campaigners and Pelicot’s children have expressed disappointment that sentences were as short as three years, with two sentences suspended.
Gisele Pelicot deserves our gratitude. However, although she is a survivor and a campaigner, she is also a victim who lives with the lifelong consequences of four sexually transmitted diseases and who has described herself as “totally destroyed.” And although her courage has inspired so many, no woman should have to be that brave or that strong. The politicians who have applauded her must now make good on her demands for change by ensuring justice for other women and addressing the culture that enables such crimes.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS