Gisele Pelicot, a 72-year-old woman who had retired to a small village in provincial France, has become a heroine not only to compatriots, but to people thousands of miles away, rightly saluted by global leaders and ordinary citizens alike. In refusing anonymity and insisting that the trial of her ex-husband and other men for raping her be held in public, she has forced a broader recognition that “shame must change sides.” Her extraordinary courage and composure shone through the grim hearings.
For almost 10 years, Gisele Pelicot’s husband of decades drugged and raped her, and sedated her so that dozens of others could rape her at his instigation.
Dominique Pelicot was caught by chance after a security guard caught him filming up women’s skirts at a supermarket, prompting police to seize his computer equipment. However, he has since admitted an attempted rape in 1999, after police matched his DNA to a sample from the scene, and is under investigation for a 1991 rape and murder that has similarities with that incident. He denies involvement.
Yet while Dominique Pelicot is one of France’s most serious sexual offenders, he is in one sense typical: Most offenders are known to their victims and many are their partners. The scale of the trial also made it clear that sexual predators are not rare or anomalous. Fifty more men stood trial and were found guilty; about 20 more have not been traced. Those were ordinary men of all ages and backgrounds, including a nurse, a journalist, a fire officer and truck drivers. Several experienced childhood sexual abuse, but others described idyllic upbringings.
In the words of the Pelicots’ former daughter-in-law, abuse is a “banality,” because “abuse is everywhere.”
The case raises hard questions about France’s culture and its legal system. The necessity of consent is not inscribed within the law. Yet women around the world could easily envision that apparently unimaginable crime happening in their countries, their neighborhoods — perhaps even their homes.
Although Gisele Pelicot has reminded women that the shame lies with their attacker, not with them, her abusers have yet to absorb that lesson. She appeared surely irreproachable to even unreconstructed observers: a married pensioner who had been attacked while unconscious and whose husband admitted to orchestrating the rapes, with men he often met in a chatroom entitled “without her knowledge,” in crimes captured in graphic videos.
And yet most of her attackers denied rape and their lawyers asked her whether she was a swinger, exhibitionist or alcoholic; why she was not angrier with her husband; why she did not cry more in court.
One perpetrator said that he “had not paid attention” to whether she had consented; another that “the husband had given me permission.” The wife of one suggested that “because I refused him [sex] all the time, as a man, he had to look elsewhere.”
In other words, although the reckoning Gisele Pelicot has forced is remarkable, it is only partial. Campaigners and Pelicot’s children have expressed disappointment that sentences were as short as three years, with two sentences suspended.
Gisele Pelicot deserves our gratitude. However, although she is a survivor and a campaigner, she is also a victim who lives with the lifelong consequences of four sexually transmitted diseases and who has described herself as “totally destroyed.” And although her courage has inspired so many, no woman should have to be that brave or that strong. The politicians who have applauded her must now make good on her demands for change by ensuring justice for other women and addressing the culture that enables such crimes.
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS