Taiwan could play a significant role in the development of robots, given the country’s strengths in chip manufacturing and software design, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said on Monday.
It is perhaps debatable whether Taiwan excels at software design, but its prowess in chip manufacturing is a globally acknowledged fact. Taiwan produces more than 60 percent of the world’s semiconductors, with TSMC leading the industry and producing chips for major companies, including Apple and Nvidia.
In his speech on Monday at the National Science and Technology Conference in Taipei, Wei said “a rich guy” — believed to be Tesla CEO Elon Musk — told him that he would focus on robots in the future. The man told Wei that chip availability is his biggest concern about those plans, which Wei dismissed as a problem easily solved by money.
Those comments are the biggest takeaway from Wei’s speech, which gets to the crux of the matter: Taiwan should seek partnerships that leverage its strengths to give it the greatest advantage amid changing trends in technology.
Companies such as Tesla, Nvidia, OpenAI and Google excel at the development of software that employs deep learning, but they need chips. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems comprise specific, interdependent hardware and software components.
Wei is right to be thinking about the industry’s future. As the adage goes, in business you innovate or die. TSMC cannot survive in a vacuum, expecting orders for chips to keep rolling in indefinitely. Besides, there are two very good reasons for TSMC — and Taiwan — to get behind AI and robotics: the population crisis and the looming threat of war.
Fortunately, the government has demonstrated acknowledgement of the importance of AI, and has already begun investing in it. President William Lai (賴清德), who was present at Monday’s event, said that NT$196.5 billion (US$6.01 billion) would be budgeted for developments in science and technology. The Executive Yuan’s Economic Development Commission would invest in 140 major infrastructure projects, of which 100 have already commenced, he added.
The Ministry of National Defense has been investing heavily in drones, which Wei also acknowledged as an important segment to focus on, and those drones would also rely on autonomous AI-powered systems. Robots might factor into future conflicts, too, particularly for use in frontline battles, where they could integrate with drones in the air and engage the enemy while keeping soldiers out of harm’s way.
However, while war is not inevitable, aging is, and that is one area where robots could be tremendously helpful. For example, in Japan roughly 10 percent of nursing homes have already acquired some type of robotic device to help with basic tasks. Although such devices are still expensive and require maintenance, they would only become less costly and more efficient over time. Japan has also already tested the use of AI in drug design, and robotics have been used in surgery for 24 years now, thanks to the da Vinci Surgical System.
Taiwan is certainly capable of building the chips to power AI and robotics systems, but has much room for progress on the software side of things.
TSMC and other major chipmakers in Taiwan should look at options for cooperation with those US companies, either through partnerships on software development, promotion of an AI research hub in Taiwan or other mutually beneficial forms of exchange. The government could also consider investing some of the funds budgeted for science and technology into bolstering computer science programs at National Taiwan University and other public schools.
Taiwan can excel in AI and robotics, but it must bolster software development in the nation, bringing it in line with Taiwan’s prowess in chip manufacturing.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS