The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus on Monday led a preliminary review of draft amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), blocking Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers from entering the meeting room. In just three minutes, the review was completed and the meeting concluded, illustrating severe procedural flaws.
In Taiwan’s constitutional system, the Legislative Yuan has the crucial function of gathering and integrating public opinion. Legislators represent the people in exercising their legislative authority — a process that must involve fair and open procedures, allowing for opinions to be expressed fully through debate. Then, through voting, the majority determines the final collective will and enacts it into law.
To prevent a tyranny of the majority, it is essential that minority opinions are respected, their voices heard and the opportunity for debate and open criticism provided — this allows the public to compare the pros and cons of each.
Although the result of a majority vote binds the minority, such decisions cannot be made through deception and trickery. Contraventions of legislative rules and procedures stemming from deception and malicious motives are more than mere technical fouls — their resulting resolutions would be deemed invalid. In particular, depriving the minority of its opportunity for equal political participation inevitably undermines the foundational principles of democracy and equality. Therefore, the result of the vote loses legitimacy and becomes ineffective.
Taiwan possesses unique national conditions — it is marked by a legacy of authoritarianism, party opposition, social division, varying national identities and significant political divides.
Although the KMT gained a legislative plurality in the last election, its total vote count was slightly lower than that of the DPP. While it has dominated the legislative process, it refuses to take on the important task of integrating the public will. Instead, it relies solely on the tyranny of the majority to implement its own will, undermining the constitutional order and disrupting governance.
Just days ago, we witnessed the majority openly infringe upon proper legislative procedures to pass a law. In order to protect the free, democratic constitutional order, President William Lai (賴清德) should refrain from promulgating the law. After accepting the case, court justices should not hesitate to conduct a constitutional review, thereby upholding judicial restraint.
Additionally, voters should recall these corrupt legislators.
All of the above actions are consistent with constitutional democratic principles, including the separation of powers.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer and a member of the Judicial Reform Foundation’s executive committee.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
RSS