Kosovo shares Taiwan’s commitment to the values of freedom, democracy, international peace and human rights.
After undergoing crimes of genocide committed by former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic’s regime, Kosovo achieved independence with NATO support. Its path to sovereignty and recognition had two main objectives: Building a resilient and democratic society, and strengthening the bonds of friendship with like-minded countries.
Sixteen years after its declaration of independence, Kosovo is a rapidly growing country whose level of democracy and rule of law have experienced substantial expansion during that time.
According to the 2022 Global State of Democracy Index, it almost equals North Macedonia and Albania in terms of “democratic performance.” Pristina has improved its performance related to the indicators of “Representation,” “Rights,” “Rule of Law” and “Participation.”
Although there is still some work to do, Kosovo’s path to a fully functioning democracy is on very solid ground. The example of countries such as Taiwan could prove beneficial to Kosovo.
During his visit to Taiwan this year, former Kosovar prime minister Avdullah Hoti said that Kosovo wants to “discuss and share experiences on parliamentary transparency and accountability” with Taipei to “strengthen democracy and citizen participation.”
Whereas Kosovo enjoys the recognition of key Western partners such as the US and the UK, but cannot leverage “soft power” to enhance its international standing, Taiwan is experiencing the opposite problem.
Taipei is one of the most important countries, because it produces more than 60 percent of the world’s semiconductors and up to 90 percent of the advanced semiconductors.
Kosovo is at the beginning of a process aimed at turning its IT potential into a national asset. Taiwan’s example demonstrates the interconnection between technological transformation and economic and social development.
Kosovo’s close relationship with the West affects its diplomatic and economic interests as well as its security and defense.
Under Kosovar Prime Minister Albin Kurti, the government has accelerated its integration with the West by becoming an associate member in the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. The main purpose is to create a security environment that discourages a potential Serbian war of aggression.
There is a window of opportunity for an effective partnership with Taiwan’s government-backed drone industry, given the common interests between the parties.
Kosovo is looking to bolster its military strength by expanding and upgrading its arsenal. Taiwan is seizing new opportunities to forge international links and build a domestic drone supply chain.
Kosovo’s understanding of Taiwan’s importance and standing at the global level is further demonstrated by Kurti’s statements at last year’s Peace Summit hosted by the Universal Peace Federation.
“The Republic of Kosovo supports peaceful developments in the Indo-Pacific,” he said. “Stability in the Taiwan Strait and freedom of navigation through the South China Sea are very important for territorial integrity, peace and security in the region.”
Kurti then referred to Taiwan as a country by asserting that “we are very interested in working with countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan in the digital field,” adding that “we greatly admire the achievements and the potential they have in this area.”
Kurti previously emphasised the need to set up a “mini-Marshall” plan for the Balkans.
By pointing out that “whenever there is a vacuum between the EU and the US, Russia and China try to enter the game,” he demonstrated a better understanding of China’s imperialistic agenda than many EU leaders.
Kosovo is willing to engage with Taiwan regardless of the political party in power. The two countries should take advantage of the potential benefits that would result from expanding their partnership.
It can happen within the framework of “parliamentary diplomacy,” as in the case of Czech Republic-Taiwan or Lithuania-Taiwan relations.
They can boost their relationship in defense and security to contribute to a more stable and democratic world. The key is to put this potential into action for the benefit of Kosovo, Taiwan and all like-minded countries..
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico and the thinktank Geopol 21.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS