Former Ukrainian parliamentarian Hanna Hopko, who chaired the Ukrainian parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs from 2014 to 2019, during her visit to Taiwan in May blasted those who said Ukraine should not arm itself and instead should sign a peace treaty.
Emphasizing that it is impossible to safeguard democracy without weapons, she said if Ukraine gave up on strengthening its capability and sought to sign a peace treaty with Russia, it could not save itself from the aggression of an authoritarian country and could end up in a hell-like “massacre.”
The pro-Russia camp in Ukraine tried to undermine the country’s national defense, discourage people from resisting and persuade people to accept Moscow’s “goodwill.”
The pro-China camp in Taiwan is attempting similar things. Pro-China people are trying to prevent the nation from bolstering its defense capabilities. They have even tried to destroy the foundations that former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and President William Lai (賴清德) laid for Taiwan’s defense autonomy.
Their primary target is the indigenous defense submarine (IDS) plan which could limit the Chinese military.
Taiwan’s first domestically made submarine named Hai Kun (海鯤) was launched in September last year.
Despite how “unreasonable” it is, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should respond reasonably because it is part of what KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) called the “2D strategy” — defense and dialogue.
However, the KMT has been reacting weirdly from the very beginning. Former KMT legislator Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷), a retired lieutenant general, made disparaging comments about the launch. KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) was accused of leaking confidential information about the submarine to China. Then-Taipei city councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), now a KMT legislator, was also allegedly involved in an information leak case.
Some in the KMT said they would investigate Huang Shu-kuang (黃曙光), the convener of the IDS program, if the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) were to assume office.
More recently, KMT legislators have delivered another bombshell. The Ministry of National Defense had budgeted NT$1.9 billion (US$58.56 million) for the third phase of its indigenous submarine program, but Hsu proposed slashing the budget by NT$1.7 billion, a 90 percent cut, leaving just NT$200 million, while Ma and Huang Jen (黃仁) have proposed cutting the budget entirely.
The KMT and the TPP were unrestrained when they proposed cutting the military budget and tried to undermine the nation’s defense capability.
In 2004, then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government, which had a legislative minority, proposed a special arms procurement budget that was blocked by the opposition 69 times.
Taiwan could have started earlier to build its own submarines and bolster its asymmetric warfare capabilities. Thanks to the opposition parties, progress was postponed for 20 years.
The same old trick is again being used by the pro-China camp in the legislature. Facing China’s military threat and expansionism, Taiwan certainly does not have another 20 years to waste.
Regarding the nation’s defense projects such as the IDS plan, the only one who should be unhappy about it is the neighboring country that is trying to annihilate Taiwan.
Why do the KMT and the TPP repeatedly try to undermine Taiwan’s defense capability?
Unscrupulous politicians who are willing to be the pawns of the Chinese Communist Party will eventually be judged by history.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Fion Khan
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS