According to media reports, after the national baseball team’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12, rumor has it that President William Lai (賴清德) is considering replacing the image of Nanwang Puyuma Wreath Experimental Elementary School’s (南王國小) junior baseball team on the NT$500 bill with an image of the “Taiwanese baseball heroes” of the national team. I think: Why not?
The designs of the New Taiwan dollar bills were renewed in about 2000 when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) gained power in the nation’s first power transfer.
According to the experience of countries across the world, a currency is renewed every 10 to 20 years.
In July, the Bank of Japan started to issue new ￥1,000, ￥5,000 and ￥10,000 banknotes, the first time in 20 years that Japan has issued new bills. The image of the ￥10,000 bill was changed from thinker Fukuzawa Yukichi to the Meiji-era entrepreneur Shibusawa Eiichi, the image of the ￥5,000 bill was changed from female writer Ichiyo Higuchi to female educator Umeko Tsuda, and the image of the ￥1,000 bill was changed from medical scientist Hideyo Noguchi to medical scientist Shibasaburo Kitasato. The design logic behind the new bills not only highlights the significance of the times, but it also makes use of the latest printing technology to prevent counterfeiting
In 2020, the UK also changed the image on the back of the ￡20 bill from economist Adam Smith to painter William Turner, which became the first art-themed British banknote. Plus, the paper banknote has been upgraded to a “plastic banknote,” which is the most durable and difficult to counterfeit. The change in material not only extends the life of the bills, but also reduces printing and transportation costs.
Taiwan should keep up with the times and take this opportunity to renew its banknotes to keep up with the world trend of replacing paper banknotes with plastic ones. Compared with traditional paper bills, the plastic ones are considered more durable and more environmentally friendly, and they have improved security features.
The meaning of renewing banknotes lies in “commemorating events of special significance.” The issuance of commemorative bills featuring baseball heroes is not only representative and appropriate, but also highlights the unique significance of Taiwan’s victory in the championship. Every time Taiwanese use the new bills, they would remember the glorious and proud moment, all of which would be of benefit to creating a “Taiwan consensus.”
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS