The US military is making plans for deployments in Okinawa and the Philippines in the event of a “Taiwan emergency,” Japan’s Kyodo news agency reported on Sunday last week. Those deployments would largely involve the dispatch of marines and missile systems on islands, with logistics provided by the Japanese military.
It has long been speculated that the US would become involved in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, but there has been no official confirmation of such by the US military.
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo in June told the Washington Post that the US planned to deploy thousands of drones around Taiwan in the event of an attack.
If Paparo’s comments reflect official planning, then drones could be deployed alongside missile systems on the Philippines’ Batanes islands and on Japan’s Yonaguni Island. Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) has said that Chinese drills suggest China would position an aircraft carrier off the east coast of Taiwan in the event of Chinese aggression toward Taiwan.
It seems likely that China would do so whether it enacted a maritime quarantine or embargo on Taiwan, or attempted a landing on Taiwan proper, since such acts would require surrounding the island. In any such event, the US would likely take control of the Bashi Channel and the narrow strait between Yonaguni and Taiwan to choke off China’s supplies to its carrier.
Drones would facilitate anti-access area denial and would render a Chinese embargo ineffective. Operation of a swarm of drones would also not be an act of war in itself, so using drones would allow the US to employ gray zone tactics in response to China’s gray zone tactics. China would not dare attempt to disable the drones or interfere with US and Japanese supply missions to Taiwan, as doing so would put China directly at risk of war with the US.
Another benefit of the US deploying missile systems and drones to the Batanes and Yonaguni is that such systems could be employed in the aerial defense of Taiwan. Ukraine has intercepted as much as 80 percent of Russian missiles fired at it, with the assistance of the US-made Patriot air-defense system, the BBC reported on Friday last week. Therefore, deployment of the Patriot and other systems on Taiwan, as well as to US, Philippine and Japanese bases near Taiwan, could be very effective in protecting Taiwan’s airspace from Chinese missiles.
Russia has reportedly begun attacking Ukraine with its Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), against which the Patriot might not be effective, but NATO forces would undoubtedly develop effective measures for defending against IRBMs. Those measures could then be used in Taiwan’s defense.
US involvement in a Taiwan-China conflict would depend on whether Tokyo granted the US access to bases in Japan for “combat beyond the defense of Japan,” Vox said in a report on Jan. 30.
Japanese might be resistant to involvement in a war that puts their own lives at risk, especially if China promised not to attack Japan if it stays out of the conflict, the report said. However, if Japan did not grant such access, it “could unravel the US-Japan alliance, leaving [Japan] itself vulnerable by cutting off its only security guarantor,” it said.
It is likely that Japan would commit to supporting the US in a Taiwan conflict, since Japan increasingly sees China as a threat — underscored in September when a “Chinese aircraft carrier for the first time passed through a narrow waterway between Yonaguni and Iriomote islands in Okinawa Prefecture,” the Japan Times reported. Japan also welcomed the aircraft carrier USS George Washington to Yokosuka Naval Base on Friday last week after a nine-year absence.
US plans to deploy assets to defend Taiwan are very much welcomed in Taiwan, and the government and military should do all they can to facilitate the US deployment and cooperate with US forces.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS