Nestled between Brazil, where supporters of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro attacked federal buildings after his election ouster, and Argentina, where the opposition leader calls libertarian President Javier Milei a “little dictator,” is a country where defeated presidential candidates rush to congratulate and even “hug” the victor.
Welcome to Uruguay, a beacon of stability on a continent rocked by gang violence and political instability, where a former history teacher was elected president on Sunday on a promise not to rock the boat.
The second and final round of Uruguay’s presidential election, in which Yamandu Orsi won back the presidency for the left after five years of center-right rule, was hailed as proof of the enduring power of the nation’s consensus-driven political culture.
Election day passed off peacefully, with 90 percent of voters in the nation of 3.4 million casting a ballot, and the center-right candidate Alvaro Delgado was gracious in defeat.
Within minutes of the results being announced, Delgado sent Orsi a “big hug and a greeting.”
Analysts said the uneventful nature of the election and polite rhetoric were testament to the moderation that characterizes politics in a country with three times as many cows as people.
“It is very difficult today, with so much polarization and such strong divisions, to create spaces for dialogue and build a shared vision of the state. Uruguay has achieved that,” said Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America program at the Wilson Center, a US think tank.
Adolfo Garce, a political scientist at the University of the Republic in Uruguay’s capital, Montevideo, attributed the lack of deep divisions to the “trauma of the dictatorship.”
From 1973 to 1985, Uruguay was run by a brutal military-led regime, one of a handful that sowed terror in the southern part of South America in the 1970s and 1980s.
Thousands of people were jailed, tortured or killed.
Garce said Uruguayans were still scarred by memories of the years preceding the dictatorship, which was marked by “a climate of polarization that did us a lot of harm and that culminated in a military coup.”
He added that the “fairly classic bipartisan logic” that had dominated politics since the return to democracy was a further stabilizing factor.
Power alternates between two large blocs — a conservative coalition dominated by the National Party of outgoing President Luis Lacalle Pou, and the leftist Broad Front.
With both camps enjoying similar levels of support, there is no incentive for either to develop “extreme positions” or “demagogic promises,” Garce added.
Daniel Chasquetti, a political science professor who also lectures at the University of the Republic, said Uruguay “has charted the same course more or less for 20, 25 years.”
Orsi “may go a little further to the left, but I don’t think there will be a significant change,” he said.
And yet underneath the surface, Uruguay faces a raft of issues, including growing disenchantment with the political system.
A Latinobarometro poll last year showed the percentage of Uruguayans who were satisfied with democracy falling 9 points in three years to 59 percent.
The Economist magazine this week flagged what it called “a worrying lack of urgency about a slew of entrenched problems,” including slowed economic growth, rising inequality and stubbornly high poverty levels.
“Most alarming” for the magazine was Uruguay’s worsening security situation linked to the country’s emergence as a cocaine-trafficking hub.
The murder rate last year stood at more than 11 murders per 100,000 inhabitants, more than double that of Chile.
Calling on Uruguay’s parties to offer more than “more-of-the-same certainty,” The Economist wrote: “Uruguayan politicians’ preference for comparing Uruguay with its troubled region, rather than the rich world, is a concession to mediocrity.”
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
RSS