This month, a worker at the Ministry of Labor who was allegedly bullied at work ended their life in their office. After the case came to light, an investigation by the Labor Standards Inspection Office of the New Taipei City Workforce Development Agency showed that its northern branch office “had yet to launch an investigation according to proper procedure” when the workplace bullying complaint was filed. This shows a lack of effective system protections.
Furthermore, it shows that Taiwan’s workplace bullying prevention systems are inadequate. The government should pick up the pace on establishing laws and regulations to protect workers’ rights.
Workplace bullying is an abuse of power and can arise from improper management, mismatches or misallocations of labor and work responsibilities, such as assigning too many duties, not directing other employees to assist, verbal abuse, exclusion, malicious accusations and other, more subtle means.
People who are affected by bullying often face enormous psychological pressure. Despite the partial guidelines established by the Occupational Safety and Health Act (職業安全衛生法) and other regulations, most of them go no further than formalized preventative measures. They lack specific implementation details for handling post-incident rectification and prohibiting bullying.
When news of the suicide broke, despite the northern branch office having the Prevention Plan Against Unlawful Infringement in the Performance of Duties (執行職務遭受不法侵害預防計畫) on the books, it had yet to fully implement harm assessments and prevention training. It also did not handle complaints, which means the regulations effectively existed in name only.
In the follow-up handling of the situation, the New Taipei City Labor Inspection Office called for improvements within a specific time frame and ordered the perpetrators to pay at most NT$150,000.
However, monetary penalties are inadequate in creating impetus to curb bullying, to say nothing of protection and relief for the people who are targeted.
The laws say that workplace bullying does not include sexual harassment or criminal liabilities, and if a complaint lacks direct evidence, the majority of complaints end up going no further than an internal investigation.
Moreover, if links in the chain of command are responsible for the bullying — as seems to be the case in the suicide — then internal investigations often just become a formality and lead to “secondary abuse.”
Taiwan has yet to clearly implement legally unambiguous regulations to prohibit workplace bullying, as well as to punish bullies. The nation also has yet to provide a legislative basis for restitution. Nor has the government established an independent mechanism dedicated to handling cases. To prevent tragedies, the issue must be squarely addressed.
The law should unambiguously prohibit workplace bullying, stipulate punishments and liabilities for perpetrators and create mechanisms for people to pursue civil damages. Such laws should not only require that corporations transparently investigate bullying behavior, but also mandate that the government provide protections and penalize people who contravene the rules.
Tsai Li-hui is an assistant professor of English at St John’s University and Taiwan Higher Education Union’s St John’s division union convener.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS