The Food and Drug Administration has recently again tried to push through a change in the status of emergency contraception (levonorgestrel), also known as the “morning-after pill,” from a prescription drug to an instruction drug.
Eight years ago, it was suspended following a debate between pharmacists and physicians. Although both sides said they argued for women’s health and rights, the public might see it as a competition for benefits. The morning-after pill can now be purchased at pharmacies without a prescription.
The government should consider women’s health, needs and the importance of safe sex, instead of being trapped in the fight between physicians and pharmacists.
Taiwan Women’s Link last month conducted an online survey to find out whether the public supports the change in the status of the morning-after pill.
About 50 percent of respondents are unaware that it is a prescription drug, while more than 65 percent of respondents support the change.
Those who oppose the change are worried about possible drug abuse and the lack of health education. Meanwhile, those who support the change think it could enhance the accessibility of the drug and women’s autonomy.
According to the WHO and medical scientific evidence, the pill does not affect women’s health in the long term, but it does have side effects. Women’s menstrual cycle could become irregular, because of hormonal changes. It could be difficult to predict ovulation and increase the risk of unplanned pregnancy.
The pill is also not 100 percent effective. If women who take the pill are not aware of these facts, it could cause physical and psychological harm. Therefore, health education is crucial.
The morning-after pill can be taken within 72 hours after sexual intercourse as an emergency contraceptive measure. The sooner it is taken, the more probable it is to prevent pregnancy. Therefore, accessibility, convenience and cost of the drug matters.
To get a prescription, a woman has to visit a doctor, spending time registering and waiting at a clinic. The threshold is much higher than purchasing it at a pharmacy. A woman could miss the optimal time for taking the pill. Therefore, a change in the drug’s status can make things easier for women in need.
There are concerns about possible drug abuse and access for underage teenagers, or about men being more reluctant to use condoms. Women would then be the only ones who bear the responsibility for birth control.
The status of emergency contraception has pros and cons. The government should consider women’s health, accessibility of the pill, health education and women’s right to know. There should be measures in place to cater to women’s needs, regardless of whether the “status quo” is maintained or not.
If it is to remain a prescription drug, the government should enact a law regarding it.
The authorities should also look into lowering the threshold of getting a prescription for the pill and improving health education to make sure that the purpose of the legislation is achieved.
If it is to become an instruction drug, authorities must ensure that the pill is provided by a pharmacist who provides concise and readable health information. The government should also consider establishing an age limit and promoting education on the importance of safe sex.
That would minimize the negative impacts of the pill on women and promote public health and education on safe sex.
Huang Shu-ing is chairperson of Taiwan Women’s Link. Chen Yi-hsuan is executive secretary of Taiwan Women’s Link.
Translated by Fion Khan
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS