The Food and Drug Administration has recently again tried to push through a change in the status of emergency contraception (levonorgestrel), also known as the “morning-after pill,” from a prescription drug to an instruction drug.
Eight years ago, it was suspended following a debate between pharmacists and physicians. Although both sides said they argued for women’s health and rights, the public might see it as a competition for benefits. The morning-after pill can now be purchased at pharmacies without a prescription.
The government should consider women’s health, needs and the importance of safe sex, instead of being trapped in the fight between physicians and pharmacists.
Taiwan Women’s Link last month conducted an online survey to find out whether the public supports the change in the status of the morning-after pill.
About 50 percent of respondents are unaware that it is a prescription drug, while more than 65 percent of respondents support the change.
Those who oppose the change are worried about possible drug abuse and the lack of health education. Meanwhile, those who support the change think it could enhance the accessibility of the drug and women’s autonomy.
According to the WHO and medical scientific evidence, the pill does not affect women’s health in the long term, but it does have side effects. Women’s menstrual cycle could become irregular, because of hormonal changes. It could be difficult to predict ovulation and increase the risk of unplanned pregnancy.
The pill is also not 100 percent effective. If women who take the pill are not aware of these facts, it could cause physical and psychological harm. Therefore, health education is crucial.
The morning-after pill can be taken within 72 hours after sexual intercourse as an emergency contraceptive measure. The sooner it is taken, the more probable it is to prevent pregnancy. Therefore, accessibility, convenience and cost of the drug matters.
To get a prescription, a woman has to visit a doctor, spending time registering and waiting at a clinic. The threshold is much higher than purchasing it at a pharmacy. A woman could miss the optimal time for taking the pill. Therefore, a change in the drug’s status can make things easier for women in need.
There are concerns about possible drug abuse and access for underage teenagers, or about men being more reluctant to use condoms. Women would then be the only ones who bear the responsibility for birth control.
The status of emergency contraception has pros and cons. The government should consider women’s health, accessibility of the pill, health education and women’s right to know. There should be measures in place to cater to women’s needs, regardless of whether the “status quo” is maintained or not.
If it is to remain a prescription drug, the government should enact a law regarding it.
The authorities should also look into lowering the threshold of getting a prescription for the pill and improving health education to make sure that the purpose of the legislation is achieved.
If it is to become an instruction drug, authorities must ensure that the pill is provided by a pharmacist who provides concise and readable health information. The government should also consider establishing an age limit and promoting education on the importance of safe sex.
That would minimize the negative impacts of the pill on women and promote public health and education on safe sex.
Huang Shu-ing is chairperson of Taiwan Women’s Link. Chen Yi-hsuan is executive secretary of Taiwan Women’s Link.
Translated by Fion Khan
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS